Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Opteron 6376

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 6376

Report a correction
Lower typical power consumption 93.44W vs 113.75W Around 20% lower typical power consumption
Lower annual commercial energy cost 100.74 $/year vs 122.64 $/year Around 20% lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 27.7 $/year vs 33.73 $/year Around 20% lower annual home energy cost
Front view of AMD Opteron 6286 SE

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 6286 SE

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 2.8 GHz vs 2.3 GHz More than 20% higher clock speed

Features Key features of the Opteron 6376  vs 6286 SE 

clock speed

Opteron 6376
2.3 GHz
Opteron 6286 SE
2.8 GHz

L2 cache

L3 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Opteron 6376  vs
6286 SE 
Clock speed 2.3 GHz 2.8 GHz
Cores 16 core 16 core
Socket type
G34

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
AVX 1.1
SSE2
F16C
MMX
SSE4
XOP
AVX
SSE3
SSE
ABM
BMI1
CLMUL
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
FMA3
SSE4.2
CVT16
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
TBM

details

Opteron 6376  vs
6286 SE 
Threads 16 16
L2 cache 16 MB 16 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 16 MB 16 MB
L3 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 4 4

power consumption

TDP 115W 140W
Annual home energy cost 27.7 $/year 33.73 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 100.74 $/year 122.64 $/year
Typical power consumption 93.44W 113.75W

bus

Architecture HyperTransport 3.0 HyperTransport 3.0
Transfer rate 6,400 MT/s 6,400 MT/s
Clock speed 3,200 MHz 3,200 MHz
AMD Opteron 6376
Report a correction
AMD Opteron 6286 SE
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus