CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 6376 vs 6136 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

4.9

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
AMD Opteron 6376 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD Opteron 6376  based on its performance and single-core performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Opteron 6376

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 6376

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 16 MB vs 4 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much better PassMark score 9,414 vs 4,631 More than 2x better PassMark score
Much more l3 cache 16 MB vs 12 MB Around 35% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
More threads 16 vs 8 Twice as many threads
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz Around 35% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz Around 35% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Newer Nov, 2012 vs Mar, 2010 Release date over 2 years later
Front view of AMD Opteron 6136

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 6136

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 2.4 GHz vs 2.3 GHz Around 5% higher clock speed
More l3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core vs 1 MB/core 50% more l3 cache per core

Benchmarks Real world tests of Opteron 6376 vs 6136

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Opteron 6376
7,577
Opteron 6136
16,500

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Opteron 6376
1,520 MB/s
Opteron 6136
99.8 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Opteron 6376  vs
6136 
Clock speed 2.3 GHz 2.4 GHz
Cores 16 core Octa core
Socket type
G34
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
AVX 1.1
SSE2
F16C
MMX
XOP
AVX
SSE3
SSE
ABM
BMI1
CLMUL
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
FMA3
SSE4.2
CVT16
AMD-V
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
AES
TBM

power consumption

TDP 115W 115W
Annual home energy cost 27.7 $/year 27.7 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 100.74 $/year 100.74 $/year
Performance per watt 1.47 pt/W 1.44 pt/W
Typical power consumption 93.44W 93.44W

bus

Architecture HyperTransport 3.0 HyperTransport 3.0
Clock speed 3,200 MHz 3,200 MHz

details

Opteron 6376  vs
6136 
Threads 16 8
L2 cache 16 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 16 MB 12 MB
L3 cache per core 1 MB/core 1.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 4 4
Clock multiplier 16 12
Operating temperature Unknown - 69°C Unknown - 55°C

overclocking

Overclock popularity 0 0
Overclocked clock speed 3.2 GHz 2.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.2 GHz 2.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.2 GHz 2.4 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
AMD Opteron 6376
Report a correction
AMD Opteron 6136
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus