Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of AMD FX 8350

AMD FX 8350

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Opteron 6328

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 6328

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 93.44W vs 159.66W More than 40% lower typical power consumption
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 4 vs 1 3 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration
More l3 cache 16 MB vs 8 MB 2x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Significantly more l3 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 1 MB/core 2x more l3 cache per core
Much lower annual home energy cost 27.7 $/year vs 56.1 $/year 2x lower annual home energy cost
Higher Maximum operating temperature 71.7 °C vs 61 °C Around 20% higher Maximum operating temperature
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 100.74 $/year vs 159.62 $/year More than 35% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD FX 8350

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 8350

Report a correction
Is unlocked Yes vs No Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
Significantly higher clock speed 4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz Around 25% higher clock speed
Higher turbo clock speed 4.2 GHz vs 3.8 GHz More than 10% higher turbo clock speed
Significantly better performance per watt 5.72 pt/W vs 2.08 pt/W More than 2.8x better performance per watt
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 8.79 GHz vs 3.8 GHz More than 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.69 GHz vs 3.8 GHz Around 25% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,525 vs 1,311 More than 15% better PassMark (Single core) score
Better PassMark score 9,134 vs 7,813 More than 15% better PassMark score

Benchmarks Real world tests of Opteron 6328 vs FX 8350

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Opteron 6328
19,224
FX 8350
11,483

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Opteron 6328
2,110
FX 8350
2,193

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Opteron 6328
2,280 MB/s
FX 8350
2,470,000 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Opteron 6328
7,813
FX 8350
9,134

PassMark (Single Core)

Opteron 6328
1,311
FX 8350
1,525

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Opteron 6328  vs
FX 8350 
Clock speed 3.2 GHz 4 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.8 GHz 4.2 GHz
Cores Octa core Octa core
Socket type
G34
AM3+
Is unlocked No Yes

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
AVX 1.1
SSE2
F16C
MMX
XOP
AVX
SSE3
SSE
ABM
BMI1
CLMUL
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
FMA3
SSE4.2
CVT16
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
TBM
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 115W 125W
Annual home energy cost 27.7 $/year 56.1 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 100.74 $/year 159.62 $/year
Performance per watt 2.08 pt/W 5.72 pt/W
Typical power consumption 93.44W 159.66W

bus

Clock speed 3,200 MHz 2,600 MHz

details

Opteron 6328  vs
FX 8350 
Threads 8 8
L2 cache 8 MB 8 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 16 MB 8 MB
L3 cache per core 2 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 4 1
Clock multiplier 19 21
Operating temperature Unknown - 71.7°C Unknown - 61°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.8 GHz 4.69 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.8 GHz 8.79 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.8 GHz 4.69 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1866
DDR3
Channels Quad Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC Yes Yes
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 29,866.66 MB/s
AMD Opteron 6328
Report a correction
AMD FX 8350
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus