AMD Opteron 6308 vs 6208 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 6308 vs the 6208. | |||||||
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 6208 vs the 6308. | |||||||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Opteron 6308 vs 6208
clock speed
L2 cache
L3 cache
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Opteron 6308 | vs | 6208 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
features | |||
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 115W | 115W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 27.7 $/year | 27.7 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 100.74 $/year | 100.74 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 93.44W | 93.44W | |
details | Opteron 6308 | vs | 6208 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 4 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 4 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | 16 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 4 MB/core | 4 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 32 nm | 32 nm |
 AMD Opteron 6308  Report a correction |  AMD Opteron 6208 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $350 | ||
| 6700K vs 6308 | ||
 | VS | |
| $128 | ||
| 8350 vs 6308 | ||
 | VS | |
| $100 | ||
| 6300 vs 6308 | ||
 | VS | |
| $901 | ||
| E5-2640 vs 6308 | ||
 | VS | |
| $210 | ||
| E3-1220 v5 vs 6308 | ||
 | VS |  |
| 4400+ vs 6208 | ||
 | VS | |
| $200 | ||
| 965 vs 6208 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| N3540 vs 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 5200 vs 3470 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| 3217U vs 847 | ||
