Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Opteron 6287 SE

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 6287 SE

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 16 MB vs 8 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 4 vs 1 3 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration
More l3 cache 16 MB vs 8 MB 2x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
More cores 16 vs 8 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 16 vs 8 Twice as many threads
Front view of AMD FX 8350

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 8350

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz Around 45% higher clock speed
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,525 vs 1,046 More than 45% better PassMark (Single core) score

Benchmarks Real world tests of Opteron 6287 SE vs FX 8350

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

FX 8350
9,134

PassMark (Single Core)

FX 8350
1,525

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Opteron 6287 SE  vs
FX 8350 
Clock speed 2.8 GHz 4 GHz
Cores 16 core Octa core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
AVX 1.1
SSE2
F16C
MMX
SSE4
XOP
AVX
SSE3
SSE
ABM
BMI1
CLMUL
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
FMA3
SSE4.2
CVT16
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
TBM

details

Opteron 6287 SE  vs
FX 8350 
Threads 16 8
L2 cache 16 MB 8 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 16 MB 8 MB
L3 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 4 1

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 159.66W

bus

Clock speed 3,200 MHz 2,600 MHz
AMD Opteron 6287 SE
Report a correction
AMD FX 8350
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus