CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 6136 vs 8350 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

6.2

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
AMD FX 8350 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD FX 8350  based on its performance and single-core performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Opteron 6136

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 6136

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 93.44W vs 159.66W More than 40% lower typical power consumption
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 4 vs 1 3 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration
More l3 cache 12 MB vs 8 MB 50% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Much lower annual home energy cost 27.7 $/year vs 56.1 $/year 2x lower annual home energy cost
More l3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core vs 1 MB/core 50% more l3 cache per core
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 100.74 $/year vs 159.62 $/year More than 35% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD FX 8350

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 8350

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 8 MB vs 4 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Is unlocked Yes vs No Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
Much higher clock speed 4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz More than 65% higher clock speed
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.69 GHz vs 2.4 GHz More than 95% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score 1,525 vs 534 More than 2.8x better PassMark (Single core) score
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Significantly better PassMark score 9,134 vs 4,631 More than 95% better PassMark score
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 8.79 GHz vs 2.4 GHz Around 3.8x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Significantly better performance per watt 5.72 pt/W vs 1.44 pt/W Around 4x better performance per watt
Newer Oct, 2012 vs Mar, 2010 Release date over 2 years later
Higher Maximum operating temperature 61 °C vs 55 °C More than 10% higher Maximum operating temperature

Benchmarks Real world tests of Opteron 6136 vs FX 8350

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Opteron 6136
16,500
FX 8350
11,483

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Opteron 6136
1,215
FX 8350
2,193

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Opteron 6136
99.8 MB/s
FX 8350
2,470,000 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Opteron 6136
4,631
FX 8350
9,134

PassMark (Single Core)

FX 8350
1,525

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Opteron 6136  vs
FX 8350 
Clock speed 2.4 GHz 4 GHz
Cores Octa core Octa core
Socket type
G34
AM3+
Is unlocked No Yes

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
AVX 1.1
SSE2
F16C
MMX
XOP
AVX
SSE3
SSE
ABM
BMI1
CLMUL
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
FMA3
SSE4.2
CVT16
AMD-V
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
AES
TBM

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

details

Opteron 6136  vs
FX 8350 
Threads 8 8
L2 cache 4 MB 8 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 12 MB 8 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 4 1
Clock multiplier 12 21
Voltage range 1 - UnknownV 0.81 - 1.45V
Operating temperature Unknown - 55°C Unknown - 61°C

overclocking

Overclock popularity 0 709
Overclocked clock speed 2.4 GHz 4.69 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.4 GHz 8.79 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.4 GHz 4.69 GHz

power consumption

TDP 115W 125W
Annual home energy cost 27.7 $/year 56.1 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 100.74 $/year 159.62 $/year
Performance per watt 1.44 pt/W 5.72 pt/W
Typical power consumption 93.44W 159.66W

bus

Clock speed 3,200 MHz 2,600 MHz
AMD Opteron 6136
Report a correction
AMD FX 8350
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus