CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 6128 vs 4365 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Opteron 6128

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 6128

Report a correction
Much more l3 cache 12 MB vs 8 MB 50% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 4 vs 2 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
More l3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core vs 1 MB/core 50% more l3 cache per core
Front view of AMD Opteron 4365

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 4365

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 8 MB vs 4 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much lower typical power consumption 32.5W vs 93.44W 2.9x lower typical power consumption
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.8 GHz vs 2.05 GHz More than 35% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.8 GHz vs 2 GHz Around 40% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 35.04 $/year vs 100.74 $/year 2.9x lower annual commercial energy cost
Much lower annual home energy cost 9.64 $/year vs 27.7 $/year 2.9x lower annual home energy cost
Newer Nov, 2012 vs Mar, 2010 Release date over 2 years later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Opteron 6128 vs 4365

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Opteron 6128  vs
4365 
Clock speed 2 GHz 2 GHz
Cores Octa core Octa core
Socket type
G34
AM2
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
AES

power consumption

TDP 115W 40W
Annual home energy cost 27.7 $/year 9.64 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 100.74 $/year 35.04 $/year
Performance per watt 0.94 pt/W 3.84 pt/W
Typical power consumption 93.44W 32.5W

details

Opteron 6128  vs
4365 
Threads 8 8
L2 cache 4 MB 8 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 12 MB 8 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 4 2
Operating temperature Unknown - 55°C Unknown - 70°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.05 GHz 2.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2 GHz 2.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.05 GHz 2.8 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus

Architecture HyperTransport 3.0 HyperTransport 3.0
Clock speed 3,200 MHz 3,200 MHz
AMD Opteron 6128
Report a correction
AMD Opteron 4365
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus