0 Comments
| AMD Opteron 4334 vs 150 |
Released December, 2012
AMD Opteron 4334
- 3.1 GHz
- Hexa core
Reasons to buy the AMD Opteron 4334
![]() | Much more l2 cache 6 MB | ![]() | Much higher clock speed 3.1 GHz |
![]() | More cores 6 | ![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm |
VS
Released August, 2005
AMD Opteron 150
- 2.4 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the 150
![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 2.44W | ![]() | Much lower annual commercial energy cost 2.63 $/year |
![]() | Much lower annual home energy cost 0.72 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 6 MB | vs | 1 MB | 6x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much higher clock speed | 3.1 GHz | vs | 2.4 GHz | Around 30% higher clock speed | |||
More cores | 6 | vs | 1 | 5 more cores; run more applications at once | |||
Much newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
More threads | 6 | vs | 1 | 5 more threads | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.3 GHz | vs | 3.03 GHz | Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.1 GHz | vs | 2.4 GHz | Around 30% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Newer | Dec, 2012 | vs | Aug, 2005 | Release date over 7 years later | |||
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
| |||||||
Much lower typical power consumption | 2.44W | vs | 77.19W | 31.7x lower typical power consumption | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 2.63 $/year | vs | 83.22 $/year | 31.7x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 0.72 $/year | vs | 22.89 $/year | 31.7x lower annual home energy cost |
Features Key features of the Opteron 4334 vs 150
clock speed
Opteron 4334
3.1 GHz
Opteron 150
2.4 GHz
L2 cache
Opteron 4334
6 MB
Opteron 150
1 MB
overclocked clock speed (air)
Opteron 4334
3.3 GHz
Opteron 150
3.03 GHz
overclocked clock speed (water)
Opteron 4334
3.1 GHz
Opteron 150
2.4 GHz
TDP
Opteron 4334
95W
Opteron 150
3W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Opteron 4334 | vs | 150 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Cores | Hexa core | Single core | |
Socket type | |||
C32 | |||
939 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
AVX 1.1 | |||
SSE2 | |||
F16C | |||
MMX | |||
XOP | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
CLMUL | |||
AMD64 | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
FMA4 | |||
FMA3 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
CVT16 | |||
AMD-V | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes |
details | Opteron 4334 | vs | 150 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 6 | 1 | |
L2 cache | 6 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 32 nm | 90 nm | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 1 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 67.7°C | 0 - 71°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclock popularity | 0 | 0 | |
Overclocked clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 3.03 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.1 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.3 GHz | 3.03 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 95W | 3W | |
Annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | 0.72 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | 2.63 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 13.7 pt/W | 17.67 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 77.19W | 2.44W |
AMD Opteron 4334 ![]() | AMD Opteron 150 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$262 | ||
4334 vs E5-2620 v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$294 | ||
4334 vs 1620 v2 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | ||
4334 vs E3-1245 v2 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | ||
4334 vs E3-1225 v2 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$199 | ||
4334 vs D-1521 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | ||
4334 vs E3-1230 v2 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$2,086 | ||
4334 vs E5-2690 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||