AMD Opteron 4334 vs 150 |
Released December, 2012
AMD Opteron 4334
- 3.1 GHz
- Hexa core
Reasons to buy the AMD Opteron 4334
 | Much more l2 cache 6 MB | | Much higher clock speed 3.1 GHz |
| | More cores 6 | | Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm |
VS
Released August, 2005
AMD Opteron 150
- 2.4 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the 150
| | Much lower typical power consumption 2.44W | | Much lower annual commercial energy cost 2.63 $/year |
| | Much lower annual home energy cost 0.72 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much more l2 cache | 6 MB | vs | 1 MB | 6x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much higher clock speed | 3.1 GHz | vs | 2.4 GHz | Around 30% higher clock speed | |||
| More cores | 6 | vs | 1 | 5 more cores; run more applications at once | |||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| More threads | 6 | vs | 1 | 5 more threads | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.3 GHz | vs | 3.03 GHz | Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.1 GHz | vs | 2.4 GHz | Around 30% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| Newer | Dec, 2012 | vs | Aug, 2005 | Release date over 7 years later | |||
| Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
| |||||||
| Much lower typical power consumption | 2.44W | vs | 77.19W | 31.7x lower typical power consumption | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 2.63 $/year | vs | 83.22 $/year | 31.7x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 0.72 $/year | vs | 22.89 $/year | 31.7x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Opteron 4334 vs 150
clock speed
L2 cache
overclocked clock speed (air)
overclocked clock speed (water)
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Opteron 4334 | vs | 150 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
| Cores | Hexa core | Single core | |
| Socket type | |||
| C32 | |||
| 939 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| AVX 1.1 | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| F16C | |||
| MMX | |||
| XOP | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| CLMUL | |||
| AMD64 | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| FMA4 | |||
| FMA3 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| CVT16 | |||
| AMD-V | |||
| 3DNow! | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
details | Opteron 4334 | vs | 150 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 6 | 1 | |
| L2 cache | 6 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 32 nm | 90 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 2 | 1 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 67.7°C | 0 - 71°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclock popularity | 0 | 0 | |
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 3.03 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.1 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.3 GHz | 3.03 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 95W | 3W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | 0.72 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | 2.63 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 13.7 pt/W | 17.67 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 77.19W | 2.44W | |
 AMD Opteron 4334  Report a correction |  AMD Opteron 150 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $294 | ||
| 4334 vs 1620 v2 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $230 | ||
| 4334 vs E3-1225 v2 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $199 | ||
| 4334 vs D-1520 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $300 | ||
| 4334 vs E3-1245 v2 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $305 | ||
| 4334 vs W3520 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $410 | ||
| 4334 vs E5-2620 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $2,086 | ||
| 4334 vs E5-2690 | ||
Popular Comparisons
| | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $125 | $50 | |
| 3220 vs 5300 | ||
