Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Opteron 3365

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 3365

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 52.81W vs 159.66W 3x lower typical power consumption
Much lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year vs 56.1 $/year 3.6x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year vs 159.62 $/year 2.8x lower annual commercial energy cost
Newer Jul, 2013 vs Oct, 2012 Release date 8 months later
Front view of AMD FX 8350

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 8350

Report a correction
Is unlocked Yes vs No Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
Much higher clock speed 4 GHz vs 2.3 GHz Around 75% higher clock speed
Significantly higher turbo clock speed 4.2 GHz vs 3.3 GHz More than 25% higher turbo clock speed
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.69 GHz vs 2.3 GHz More than 2x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 8.79 GHz vs 2.3 GHz More than 3.8x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,525 vs 1,044 More than 45% better PassMark (Single core) score
Better PassMark score 9,134 vs 5,803 More than 55% better PassMark score
Significantly better performance per watt 5.72 pt/W vs 2.72 pt/W More than 2x better performance per watt

Benchmarks Real world tests of Opteron 3365 vs FX 8350

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Opteron 3365
5,803
FX 8350
9,134

PassMark (Single Core)

Opteron 3365
1,044
FX 8350
1,525

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Opteron 3365  vs
FX 8350 
Clock speed 2.3 GHz 4 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.3 GHz 4.2 GHz
Cores Octa core Octa core
Socket type
AM3+
Is unlocked No Yes

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
AVX 1.1
SSE2
F16C
MMX
XOP
AVX
SSE3
SSE
ABM
BMI1
CLMUL
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
FMA3
SSE4.2
CVT16
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
TBM
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 65W 125W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year 56.1 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year 159.62 $/year
Performance per watt 2.72 pt/W 5.72 pt/W
Typical power consumption 52.81W 159.66W

details

Opteron 3365  vs
FX 8350 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 8 8
L2 cache 8 MB 8 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 8 MB 8 MB
L3 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 32 nm
Die size 315 mm² 319 mm²
Clock multiplier 11 21

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.3 GHz 4.69 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.3 GHz 8.79 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.3 GHz 4.69 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC Yes Yes
AMD Opteron 3365
Report a correction
AMD FX 8350
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus