CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 3365 vs 6100 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

FX 6100
n.d.
FX 6300
n.d.
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

FX 6100
n.d.
FX 6300
n.d.
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

4.7

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
AMD FX 6100 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD FX 6100  based on its single-core performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Opteron 3365

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 3365

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 8 MB vs 6 MB Around 35% more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year vs 48.09 $/year 3.1x lower annual home energy cost
More cores 8 vs 6 2 more cores; run more applications at once
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year vs 136.66 $/year 2.4x lower annual commercial energy cost
More threads 8 vs 6 2 more threads
Newer Jul, 2013 vs Oct, 2011 Release date over 1 years later
Front view of AMD FX 6100

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 6100

Report a correction
Is unlocked Yes vs No Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
Significantly higher clock speed 3.3 GHz vs 2.3 GHz Around 45% higher clock speed
Higher turbo clock speed 3.9 GHz vs 3.3 GHz Around 20% higher turbo clock speed
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.4 GHz vs 2.3 GHz More than 90% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.72 GHz vs 2.3 GHz More than 2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
More l3 cache per core 1.33 MB/core vs 1 MB/core Around 35% more l3 cache per core
Slightly better PassMark (Single core) score 1,184 vs 1,044 Around 15% better PassMark (Single core) score
Better performance per watt 3.75 pt/W vs 2.72 pt/W Around 40% better performance per watt

Benchmarks Real world tests of Opteron 3365 vs FX 6100

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Opteron 3365
5,803
FX 6100
5,409

PassMark (Single Core)

Opteron 3365
1,044
FX 6100
1,184

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Opteron 3365  vs
FX 6100 
Clock speed 2.3 GHz 3.3 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.3 GHz 3.9 GHz
Cores Octa core Hexa core
Socket type
AM3+
Is unlocked No Yes

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
AVX 1.1
SSE2
F16C
MMX
XOP
AVX
SSE3
SSE
ABM
CLMUL
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
FMA3
SSE4.2
CVT16
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 65W 95W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year 48.09 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year 136.66 $/year
Performance per watt 2.72 pt/W 3.75 pt/W
Typical power consumption 52.81W N/A

bus

Architecture HyperTransport 3.0 HyperTransport 3.1

details

Opteron 3365  vs
FX 6100 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 8 6
L2 cache 8 MB 6 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 8 MB 8 MB
L3 cache per core 1 MB/core 1.33 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 32 nm
Die size 315 mm² 319 mm²

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.3 GHz 4.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.3 GHz 4.72 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.3 GHz 4.4 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC Yes Yes
AMD Opteron 3365
Report a correction
AMD FX 6100
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus