CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 3350 HE vs 615e among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

4.9

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
AMD Opteron 3350 HE 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD Opteron 3350 HE  based on its performance and single-core performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

AMD Opteron 3350 HE

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of AMD Opteron 3350 HE

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Opteron 3350 HE

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 3350 HE

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 2 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More l3 cache 8 MB vs 0.5 MB 16x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Higher clock speed 2.8 GHz vs 2.5 GHz More than 10% higher clock speed
Much more l3 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 0.13 MB/core 16x more l3 cache per core
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,264 vs 862 More than 45% better PassMark (Single core) score
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 5,191 vs 4,373 Around 20% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Newer Dec, 2012 vs Sep, 2010 Release date over 2 years later
Slightly better performance per watt 2.62 pt/W vs 1.94 pt/W More than 35% better performance per watt
Front view of AMD Athlon II X4 615e

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon II X4 615e

Report a correction
Slightly higher Maximum operating temperature 72 °C vs 69.1 °C Around 5% higher Maximum operating temperature

Benchmarks Real world tests of Opteron 3350 HE vs Athlon II X4 615e

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Opteron 3350 HE
1,930 MB/s
Athlon II X4 615e
99.8 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Opteron 3350 HE  vs
Athlon II X4 615e 
Clock speed 2.8 GHz 2.5 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Socket type
C32
AM3+
AM3
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
AVX 1.1
SSE2
F16C
MMX
XOP
AVX
SSE3
SSE
CLMUL
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
FMA3
SSE4.2
CVT16
AMD-V
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 45W 45W
Annual home energy cost 10.84 $/year 10.84 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 39.42 $/year 39.42 $/year
Performance per watt 2.62 pt/W 1.94 pt/W
Typical power consumption 36.56W 36.56W

details

Opteron 3350 HE  vs
Athlon II X4 615e 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 4 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 8 MB 0.5 MB
L3 cache per core 2 MB/core 0.13 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 69.1°C Unknown - 72°C

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus

Clock speed 2,600 MHz 2,000 MHz
AMD Opteron 3350 HE
Report a correction
AMD Athlon II X4 615e
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus