Winner
AMD Opteron 3350 HE
CPUBoss recommends the AMD Opteron 3350 HE based on its performance and single-core performance.
See full details AMD Opteron 3350 HE vs Athlon II X4 615e |
Released December, 2012
AMD Opteron 3350 HE
- 2.8 GHz
- Quad core
4.9 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the AMD Opteron 3350 HE
 | Much more l2 cache 4 MB | | Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm |
| | More l3 cache 8 MB | | Higher clock speed 2.8 GHz |
VS
Released September, 2010
AMD Athlon II X4 615e
- 2.5 GHz
- Quad core
4.6 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Athlon II X4 615e
| | Slightly higher Maximum operating temperature 72 °C |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 3350 HE vs 615e among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 4.9 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
AMD Opteron 3350 HECPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much more l2 cache | 4 MB | vs | 2 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| More l3 cache | 8 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 16x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
| Higher clock speed | 2.8 GHz | vs | 2.5 GHz | More than 10% higher clock speed | |||
| Much more l3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 0.13 MB/core | 16x more l3 cache per core | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,264 | vs | 862 | More than 45% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | 5,191 | vs | 4,373 | Around 20% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | |||
| Newer | Dec, 2012 | vs | Sep, 2010 | Release date over 2 years later | |||
| Slightly better performance per watt | 2.62 pt/W | vs | 1.94 pt/W | More than 35% better performance per watt | |||
| |||||||
| Slightly higher Maximum operating temperature | 72 °C | vs | 69.1 °C | Around 5% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Opteron 3350 HE vs Athlon II X4 615e
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Opteron 3350 HE | vs | Athlon II X4 615e |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
| Socket type | |||
| C32 | |||
| AM3+ | |||
| AM3 | |||
| Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| AVX 1.1 | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| F16C | |||
| MMX | |||
| XOP | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| CLMUL | |||
| AMD64 | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| FMA4 | |||
| FMA3 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| CVT16 | |||
| AMD-V | |||
| 3DNow! | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 45W | 45W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 10.84 $/year | 10.84 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 39.42 $/year | 39.42 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 2.62 pt/W | 1.94 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 36.56W | 36.56W | |
details | Opteron 3350 HE | vs | Athlon II X4 615e |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 2 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 0.5 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 0.13 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 32 nm | 45 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 69.1°C | Unknown - 72°C | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
| Clock speed | 2,600 MHz | 2,000 MHz | |
 AMD Opteron 3350 HE  Report a correction |  AMD Athlon II X4 615e Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | $250 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||
