Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of AMD FX 8370E

AMD FX 8370E

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Opteron 3280

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 3280

Report a correction
Much better performance per watt 10.33 pt/W vs 2.31 pt/W Around 4.5x better performance per watt
Significantly lower typical power consumption 52.81W vs 77.19W More than 30% lower typical power consumption
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year vs 22.89 $/year More than 30% lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year vs 83.22 $/year More than 30% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD FX 8370E

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 8370E

Report a correction
Is unlocked Yes vs No Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
Significantly higher clock speed 3.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz Around 40% higher clock speed
Significantly higher turbo clock speed 4.3 GHz vs 3.4 GHz More than 25% higher turbo clock speed
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.97 GHz vs 2.87 GHz Around 75% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,414 vs 875 More than 60% better PassMark (Single core) score
Better PassMark score 7,768 vs 5,330 More than 45% better PassMark score
Higher Maximum operating temperature 70.5 °C vs 61.1 °C More than 15% higher Maximum operating temperature
Newer Sep, 2014 vs Mar, 2012 Release date over 2 years later
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.82 GHz vs 2.4 GHz More than 2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Opteron 3280 vs FX 8370E

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Opteron 3280
2,986
FX 8370E
14,389

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Opteron 3280
1,710,000 MB/s
FX 8370E
2,910 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Opteron 3280
5,330
FX 8370E
7,768

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Opteron 3280  vs
FX 8370E 
Clock speed 2.4 GHz 3.3 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.4 GHz 4.3 GHz
Cores Octa core Octa core
Is unlocked No Yes

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
AVX 1.1
SSE2
F16C
MMX
SSE4
XOP
AVX
SSE3
SSE
ABM
BMI1
CLMUL
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
FMA3
SSE4.2
CVT16
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
TBM

power consumption

TDP 65W 95W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year 22.89 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year 83.22 $/year
Performance per watt 10.33 pt/W 2.31 pt/W
Typical power consumption 52.81W 77.19W

details

Opteron 3280  vs
FX 8370E 
Threads 8 8
L2 cache 8 MB 8 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 8 MB 8 MB
L3 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 32 nm
Clock multiplier 12 21
Operating temperature Unknown - 61.1°C Unknown - 70.5°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.87 GHz 4.97 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.4 GHz 4.82 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.87 GHz 4.97 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1866
DDR3
AMD Opteron 3280
Report a correction
AMD FX 8370E
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus