Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Opteron 285

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 285

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 2.6 GHz vs 2 GHz More than 30% higher clock speed
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.6 GHz vs 2 GHz More than 30% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.6 GHz vs 2 GHz More than 30% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Newer Mar, 2006 vs Jan, 2005 Release date over 1 years later
Front view of AMD Opteron 270

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 270

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 270 vs the 285.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Opteron 285 vs 270

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Opteron 285
1,470
Opteron 270
1,083

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Opteron 285  vs
270 
Clock speed 2.6 GHz 2 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
940

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Opteron 285  vs
270 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 90 nm
Max CPUs 2 2
Clock multiplier 13 10
Voltage range 1 - UnknownV 1 - UnknownV
Operating temperature 0 - 67°C 0 - 67°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.6 GHz 2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.6 GHz 2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.6 GHz 2 GHz

power consumption

TDP 95W 95W
Annual home energy cost 22.89 $/year 22.89 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year 83.22 $/year
Performance per watt 0.7 pt/W 0.47 pt/W
Typical power consumption 77.19W 77.19W
AMD Opteron 285
Report a correction
AMD Opteron 270
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus