Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Opteron 250

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 250

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 2.44W vs 52.81W 21.7x lower typical power consumption
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Much lower annual home energy cost 0.72 $/year vs 15.66 $/year 21.7x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 2.63 $/year vs 56.94 $/year 21.7x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD A4 3300

Reasons to consider the
AMD A4 3300

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once

Features Key features of the Opteron 250  vs A4 3300 

clock speed

Opteron 250
2.4 GHz
A4 3300
2.5 GHz

L2 cache

A4 3300
1 MB

TDP

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Opteron 250  vs
A4 3300 
Clock speed 2.4 GHz 2.5 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core
Socket type
940
FM1

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
AMD-V
3DNow!
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Opteron 250  vs
A4 3300 
Threads 1 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 2 1

power consumption

TDP 3W 65W
Annual home energy cost 0.72 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 2.63 $/year 56.94 $/year
Typical power consumption 2.44W 52.81W
AMD Opteron 250
Report a correction
AMD A4 3300
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus