CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 2435 vs 2393 SE among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

AMD Opteron 2435

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of AMD Opteron 2435

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Opteron 2435

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 2435

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 3 MB vs 2 MB 50% more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More cores 6 vs 4 2 more cores; run more applications at once
Significantly lower typical power consumption 60.94W vs 85.31W Around 30% lower typical power consumption
More threads 6 vs 4 2 more threads
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 65.7 $/year vs 91.98 $/year Around 30% lower annual commercial energy cost
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 18.07 $/year vs 25.29 $/year Around 30% lower annual home energy cost
Front view of AMD Opteron 2393 SE

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 2393 SE

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3.1 GHz vs 2.6 GHz Around 20% higher clock speed
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.1 GHz vs 2.61 GHz Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
More l3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core vs 1 MB/core 50% more l3 cache per core
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.1 GHz vs 2.6 GHz Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Opteron 2435 vs 2393 SE

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Opteron 2435  vs
2393 SE 
Clock speed 2.6 GHz 3.1 GHz
Cores Hexa core Quad core
Socket type
F
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 75W 105W
Annual home energy cost 18.07 $/year 25.29 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 65.7 $/year 91.98 $/year
Performance per watt 2.04 pt/W 1.03 pt/W
Typical power consumption 60.94W 85.31W

bus

Architecture HyperTransport 3.0 HyperTransport 3.0
Clock speed 2,200 MHz 2,200 MHz

details

Opteron 2435  vs
2393 SE 
Threads 6 4
L2 cache 3 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 6 MB 6 MB
L3 cache per core 1 MB/core 1.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 2 2
Clock multiplier 13 15
Voltage range 1 - UnknownV 1.32 - UnknownV
Operating temperature 0 - 55°C 0 - 55°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.61 GHz 3.1 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.6 GHz 3.1 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.61 GHz 3.1 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
AMD Opteron 2435
Report a correction
AMD Opteron 2393 SE
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus