Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Opteron 2387

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 2387

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much lower typical power consumption 60.94W vs 101.56W 40% lower typical power consumption
More l3 cache 6 MB vs 0 MB Compared to all cpus, 6 MB l3 cache is just OK
Much more l3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core vs 0 MB/core Compared to all cpus, 1.5 MB/core l3 cache per core is just OK
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Newer Feb, 2009 vs Feb, 2007 Release date over 2 years later
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Much lower annual home energy cost 18.07 $/year vs 30.11 $/year 40% lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 65.7 $/year vs 109.5 $/year 40% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD Athlon X2 6000+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon X2 6000+

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 3 GHz vs 2.8 GHz More than 5% higher clock speed
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.33 GHz vs 2.8 GHz Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.53 GHz vs 2.8 GHz More than 25% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Features Key features of the Opteron 2387  vs Athlon X2 6000+ 

clock speed

L2 cache

L3 cache

overclocked clock speed (air)

Opteron 2387
2.8 GHz
Athlon X2 6000+
3.33 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Opteron 2387
2.8 GHz
Athlon X2 6000+
3.53 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Opteron 2387  vs
Athlon X2 6000+ 
Clock speed 2.8 GHz 3 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core
Socket type
F
AM2
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 75W 125W
Annual home energy cost 18.07 $/year 30.11 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 65.7 $/year 109.5 $/year
Typical power consumption 60.94W 101.56W

details

Opteron 2387  vs
Athlon X2 6000+ 
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 6 MB 0 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 0 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 90 nm
Max CPUs 2 1
Voltage range 1.32 - UnknownV 1.35 - 1.4V
Operating temperature 0 - 55°C Unknown - 55°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.8 GHz 3.33 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.8 GHz 3.53 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.8 GHz 3.33 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
AMD Opteron 2387
Report a correction
AMD Athlon X2 6000+
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus