CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 2384 vs 4100 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

FX 4100
n.d.
FX 4300
n.d.
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

FX 4100
9.6
FX 4300
10.0
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

6.3

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
AMD FX 4100 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD FX 4100  based on its performance and single-core performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Opteron 2384

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 2384

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 8,798 vs 5,176 Around 70% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
Much lower annual home energy cost 18.07 $/year vs 34.18 $/year More than 45% lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 65.7 $/year vs 114.41 $/year Around 45% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD FX 4100

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 4100

Report a correction
Is unlocked Yes vs No Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 2 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Significantly higher clock speed 3.6 GHz vs 2.7 GHz Around 35% higher clock speed
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.66 GHz vs 2.7 GHz Around 75% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Significantly better performance per watt 6.46 pt/W vs 2.12 pt/W More than 3x better performance per watt
Slightly more l3 cache 8 MB vs 6 MB Around 35% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 70.5 °C vs 55 °C Around 30% higher Maximum operating temperature
Better geekbench 3 single core score 1,827 vs 1,334 More than 35% better geekbench 3 single core score
More l3 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 1.5 MB/core Around 35% more l3 cache per core
Newer Oct, 2011 vs Nov, 2008 Release date over 2 years later
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.99 GHz vs 2.7 GHz Around 85% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Opteron 2384 vs FX 4100

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Opteron 2384
8,798
FX 4100
5,176

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Opteron 2384
1,334
FX 4100
1,827

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Opteron 2384
108,800 MB/s
FX 4100
2,150,000 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Opteron 2384
3,538
FX 4100
4,051

PassMark (Single Core)

FX 4100
1,221

Reviews Word on the street

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Opteron 2384  vs
FX 4100 
Clock speed 2.7 GHz 3.6 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Socket type
F
AM3+
Is unlocked No Yes

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
F16C
MMX
XOP
AVX
SSE3
SSE
ABM
CLMUL
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
SSE4.2
CVT16
AMD-V
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 75W 95W
Annual home energy cost 18.07 $/year 34.18 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 65.7 $/year 114.41 $/year
Performance per watt 2.12 pt/W 6.46 pt/W
Typical power consumption 60.94W N/A

details

Opteron 2384  vs
FX 4100 
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 2 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 6 MB 8 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 2 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 2 1
Voltage range 1.3 - UnknownV 1.14 - 1.55V
Operating temperature 0 - 55°C Unknown - 70.5°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.7 GHz 4.66 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.7 GHz 4.99 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.7 GHz 4.66 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus

Clock speed 2,200 MHz 3,200 MHz
AMD Opteron 2384
Report a correction
AMD FX 4100
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus