CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 2384 vs 4600M among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

8.3

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
AMD A10 4600M 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD A10 4600M  based on its single-core performance and power consumption.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of AMD A10 4600M

AMD A10 4600M

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Opteron 2384

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 2384

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 2.7 GHz vs 2.3 GHz More than 15% higher clock speed
Much better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 8,798 vs 3,860 More than 2.2x better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
More l3 cache 6 MB vs 1 MB 6x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
Much more l3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 6x more l3 cache per core
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.7 GHz vs 2.3 GHz More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of AMD A10 4600M

Reasons to consider the
AMD A10 4600M

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 2 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much lower typical power consumption 28.44W vs 60.94W 2.1x lower typical power consumption
Much better performance per watt 11.44 pt/W vs 2.12 pt/W Around 5.5x better performance per watt
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 100 °C vs 55 °C More than 80% higher Maximum operating temperature
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Newer May, 2012 vs Nov, 2008 Release date over 3 years later
Much lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year vs 18.07 $/year 2.1x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year vs 65.7 $/year 2.1x lower annual commercial energy cost
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.93 GHz vs 2.7 GHz Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Opteron 2384 vs A10 4600M

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Opteron 2384
8,798
A10 4600M
3,860

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Opteron 2384
1,334
A10 4600M
1,434

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Opteron 2384
108,800 MB/s
A10 4600M
1,670,000 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Opteron 2384
3,538
A10 4600M
3,174

PassMark (Single Core)

Reviews Word on the street

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Opteron 2384  vs
A10 4600M 
Clock speed 2.7 GHz 2.3 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
AVX 1.1
SSE2
F16C
MMX
XOP
AVX
SSE3
SSE
CLMUL
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
FMA3
SSE4.2
CVT16
AMD-V
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 75W 35W
Annual home energy cost 18.07 $/year 8.43 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 65.7 $/year 30.66 $/year
Performance per watt 2.12 pt/W 11.44 pt/W
Typical power consumption 60.94W 28.44W

details

Opteron 2384  vs
A10 4600M 
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 2 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 6 MB 1 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 2 1
Clock multiplier 13 23
Voltage range 1.3 - UnknownV 0.81 - 1.3V
Operating temperature 0 - 55°C Unknown - 100°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.7 GHz 2.93 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.7 GHz 2.3 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.7 GHz 2.93 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Radeon™ HD 7660G
Latest DirectX N/A 11.0
GPU clock speed N/A 496 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 685 MHz
AMD Opteron 2384
Report a correction
AMD A10 4600M
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus