CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 2360 SE vs 2352 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

5.1

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
AMD Opteron 2352 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD Opteron 2352  based on its cost to run.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Opteron 2360 SE

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 2360 SE

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 2.5 GHz vs 2.1 GHz Around 20% higher clock speed
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.95 GHz vs 2.1 GHz More than 40% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.5 GHz vs 2.1 GHz Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of AMD Opteron 2352

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 2352

Report a correction
Significantly lower typical power consumption 60.94W vs 85.31W Around 30% lower typical power consumption
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 65.7 $/year vs 91.98 $/year Around 30% lower annual commercial energy cost
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 18.07 $/year vs 25.29 $/year Around 30% lower annual home energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Opteron 2360 SE vs 2352

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Opteron 2360 SE
146,600 MB/s
Opteron 2352
80.8 MB/s

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Opteron 2360 SE  vs
2352 
Clock speed 2.5 GHz 2.1 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Socket type
F
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 105W 75W
Annual home energy cost 25.29 $/year 18.07 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 91.98 $/year 65.7 $/year
Performance per watt 1.84 pt/W 0.57 pt/W
Typical power consumption 85.31W 60.94W

details

Opteron 2360 SE  vs
2352 
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L3 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 2 2
Clock multiplier 12 10
Voltage range 1.2 - UnknownV 1 - UnknownV

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.95 GHz 2.1 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.5 GHz 2.1 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.95 GHz 2.1 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus

Clock speed 2,000 MHz 1,800 MHz
AMD Opteron 2360 SE
Report a correction
AMD Opteron 2352
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus