AMD Opteron 180 vs Athlon 64 X2 4400+ |
Released September, 2005
AMD Opteron 180
- 2.4 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the AMD Opteron 180
 | Much more l2 cache 2 MB | | Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm |
| | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core | | Higher clock speed 2.4 GHz |
VS
First seen on January, 2013
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+
- 2.3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Athlon 64 X2 4400+
| | Much lower typical power consumption 52.81W | | Much lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year |
| | Much lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year | | Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.13 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much newer manufacturing process | 45 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Higher clock speed | 2.4 GHz | vs | 2.3 GHz | Around 5% higher clock speed | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.99 GHz | vs | 2.75 GHz | Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| |||||||
| Much lower typical power consumption | 52.81W | vs | 89.38W | More than 40% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | vs | 96.36 $/year | More than 40% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | vs | 26.5 $/year | More than 40% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.13 GHz | vs | 2.4 GHz | More than 30% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Opteron 180 vs Athlon 64 X2 4400+
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Opteron 180 | vs | Athlon 64 X2 4400+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.3 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| 939 | |||
| AM2 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| 3DNow! | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
details | Opteron 180 | vs | Athlon 64 X2 4400+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 45 nm | 90 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.99 GHz | 2.75 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.4 GHz | 3.13 GHz | |
| PassMark (Overclocked) | 2,238.6 | 1,605.4 | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.99 GHz | 2.75 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 110W | 65W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 26.5 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 96.36 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 0.68 pt/W | 0.89 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 89.38W | 52.81W | |
 AMD Opteron 180  Report a correction |  AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+ Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| Intel Core i5 3470 vs AMD A6 5200 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| Intel Celeron 847 vs Core i3 3217U | ||
