Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of AMD Athlon 64 FX 60

AMD Athlon 64 FX 60

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Opteron 175

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 175

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Opteron 175 vs the Athlon 64 FX 60.

Front view of AMD Athlon 64 FX 60

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 64 FX 60

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 2.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz Around 20% higher clock speed
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.05 GHz vs 2.2 GHz Around 40% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Newer Jan, 2006 vs Aug, 2005 Release date 5 months later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Opteron 175 vs Athlon 64 FX 60

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Opteron 175  vs
Athlon 64 FX 60 
Clock speed 2.2 GHz 2.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
939

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!

details

Opteron 175  vs
Athlon 64 FX 60 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 90 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature 0 - 65°C Unknown - 65°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.77 GHz 2.89 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.2 GHz 3.05 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.77 GHz 2.89 GHz

power consumption

TDP 110W 110W
Annual home energy cost 26.5 $/year 26.5 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 96.36 $/year 96.36 $/year
Performance per watt 0.57 pt/W 0.44 pt/W
Typical power consumption 89.38W 89.38W
AMD Opteron 175
Report a correction
AMD Athlon 64 FX 60
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus