AMD Opteron 165 HE vs Athlon 64 X2 4400+ |
Released August, 2005
AMD Opteron 165 HE
- 1.8 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the AMD Opteron 165 HE
 | Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 49,700 MB/s | | Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB |
| | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core | | Lower typical power consumption 44.69W |
VS
First seen on January, 2013
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+
- 2.3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Athlon 64 X2 4400+
| | Higher clock speed 2.3 GHz | | Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.75 GHz |
| | Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 2,435 | | Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.13 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
| |  | AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+CPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score | 49,700 MB/s | vs | 85.5 MB/s | More than 581.2x better geekbench 3 AES single core score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Lower typical power consumption | 44.69W | vs | 52.81W | More than 15% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Lower annual home energy cost | 13.25 $/year | vs | 15.66 $/year | More than 15% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Lower annual commercial energy cost | 48.18 $/year | vs | 56.94 $/year | More than 15% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 2.3 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | Around 30% higher clock speed | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.75 GHz | vs | 2 GHz | More than 35% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | 2,435 | vs | 1,363 | Around 80% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.13 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | Around 75% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Opteron 165 HE vs Athlon 64 X2 4400+
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Opteron 165 HE | vs | Athlon 64 X2 4400+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 2.3 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| 939 | |||
| 940 | |||
| AM2 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| 3DNow! | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
details | Opteron 165 HE | vs | Athlon 64 X2 4400+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 90 nm | 90 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.75 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.8 GHz | 3.13 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2 GHz | 2.75 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 55W | 65W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 13.25 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 48.18 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 1 pt/W | 0.89 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 44.69W | 52.81W | |
 AMD Opteron 165 HE  Report a correction |  AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+ Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| E6300 vs 4400+ | ||
 | VS | |
| $69 | ||
| 640 vs 4400+ | ||
 | VS | |
| $74 | ||
| 820 vs 4400+ | ||
 | VS | |
| 550 vs 4400+ | ||
 | VS | |
| $125 | ||
| 3220 vs 4400+ | ||
 | VS | |
| $200 | ||
| 965 vs 4400+ | ||
 | VS | |
| $179 | ||
| E8400 vs 4400+ | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| N3540 vs 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $230 | $248 | |
| 9590 vs 4770K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | $250 | |
| 6700K vs 6600K | ||
