Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Opteron 150

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 150

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 90 nm vs 130 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much lower typical power consumption 2.44W vs 72.31W 29.7x lower typical power consumption
Much lower annual home energy cost 0.72 $/year vs 21.44 $/year 29.7x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 2.63 $/year vs 77.96 $/year 29.7x lower annual commercial energy cost
Newer Aug, 2005 vs Mar, 2004 Release date over 1 years later
Front view of AMD Athlon 64 FX 53

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 64 FX 53

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Athlon 64 FX 53 vs the Opteron 150.

Features Key features of the Opteron 150  vs Athlon 64 FX 53 

clock speed

Opteron 150
2.4 GHz
Athlon 64 FX 53
2.4 GHz

L2 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Opteron 150  vs
Athlon 64 FX 53 
Clock speed 2.4 GHz 2.4 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
939
940

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!

details

Opteron 150  vs
Athlon 64 FX 53 
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 130 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature 0 - 71°C Unknown - 70°C

power consumption

TDP 3W 89W
Annual home energy cost 0.72 $/year 21.44 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 2.63 $/year 77.96 $/year
Typical power consumption 2.44W 72.31W
AMD Opteron 150
Report a correction
AMD Athlon 64 FX 53
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus