Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

AMD Opteron 148

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of AMD Opteron 148

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Opteron 148

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 148

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz More than 10% higher clock speed
Front view of AMD Athlon 64 3200+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 64 3200+

Report a correction
Newer May, 2006 vs May, 2004 Release date over 2 years later
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.87 GHz vs 2.2 GHz More than 30% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Opteron 148 vs Athlon 64 3200+

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Opteron 148  vs
Athlon 64 3200+ 
Clock speed 2.2 GHz 2 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
939
940
754
AM2

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Opteron 148  vs
Athlon 64 3200+ 
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 130 nm 130 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature 0 - 71°C Unknown - 70°C

overclocking

Overclock popularity 0 3
Overclock review score 0 0
Overclocked clock speed 2.8 GHz 2.69 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.2 GHz 2.87 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.8 GHz 2.69 GHz

power consumption

TDP 85.3W 89W
Annual home energy cost 20.55 $/year 21.44 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 74.72 $/year 77.96 $/year
Performance per watt 0.59 pt/W 0.34 pt/W
Typical power consumption 69.31W 72.31W
AMD Opteron 148
Report a correction
AMD Athlon 64 3200+
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus