AMD Opteron 140 vs FX 8350 |
Released June, 2003
AMD Opteron 140
- 1.4 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the AMD Opteron 140
 | Much lower typical power consumption 66.71W | | Much lower annual home energy cost 19.78 $/year |
| | Much lower annual commercial energy cost 71.92 $/year |
VS
Released October, 2012
AMD FX 8350
- 4 GHz
- Octa core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the FX 8350
| | Much more l2 cache 8 MB | | Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm |
| | Much higher clock speed 4 GHz | | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.69 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much lower typical power consumption | 66.71W | vs | 159.66W | 2.4x lower typical power consumption | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 19.78 $/year | vs | 56.1 $/year | 2.8x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 71.92 $/year | vs | 159.62 $/year | 2.2x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| Much more l2 cache | 8 MB | vs | 1 MB | 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 130 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Much higher clock speed | 4 GHz | vs | 1.4 GHz | More than 2.8x higher clock speed | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.69 GHz | vs | 1.4 GHz | More than 3.2x better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| More cores | 8 | vs | 1 | 7 more cores; run more applications at once | |||
| Much better PassMark score | 9,134 | vs | 396 | More than 23x better PassMark score | |||
| Newer | Oct, 2012 | vs | Jun, 2003 | Release date over 9 years later | |||
| Much better performance per watt | 5.72 pt/W | vs | 0.2 pt/W | More than 29x better performance per watt | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 8.79 GHz | vs | 1.4 GHz | More than 6.2x better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| More threads | 8 | vs | 1 | 7 more threads | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Opteron 140 vs FX 8350
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Opteron 140 | vs | FX 8350 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.4 GHz | 4 GHz | |
| Cores | Single core | Octa core | |
| Socket type | |||
| 940 | |||
| AM3+ | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| AVX 1.1 | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| F16C | |||
| MMX | |||
| XOP | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| ABM | |||
| BMI1 | |||
| CLMUL | |||
| AMD64 | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| FMA4 | |||
| FMA3 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| CVT16 | |||
| AMD-V | |||
| 3DNow! | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| TBM | |||
details | Opteron 140 | vs | FX 8350 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 1 | 8 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 8 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 130 nm | 32 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 7 | 21 | |
| Voltage range | 1.5 - UnknownV | 0.81 - 1.45V | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 1.4 GHz | 4.69 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.4 GHz | 8.79 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.4 GHz | 4.69 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 82.1W | 125W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 19.78 $/year | 56.1 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 71.92 $/year | 159.62 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 0.2 pt/W | 5.72 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 66.71W | 159.66W | |
 AMD Opteron 140  Report a correction |  AMD FX 8350 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $128 | $264 | |
| 8350 vs 3770K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $128 | $100 | |
| 8350 vs 6300 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $128 | $350 | |
| 8350 vs 6700K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $128 | $180 | |
| 8350 vs 8370 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $128 | $250 | |
| 8350 vs 6600K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $128 | $230 | |
| 8350 vs 9590 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $128 | $190 | |
| 8350 vs 4460 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS | |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| 847 vs 3217U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
