CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 1216 HE vs 6400+ among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of AMD Athlon X2 6400+

AMD Athlon X2 6400+

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Opteron 1216 HE

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 1216 HE

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 52.81W vs 101.56W Around 50% lower typical power consumption
More l3 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0 MB/core Compared to all cpus, 0.5 MB/core l3 cache per core is just OK
Much lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year vs 30.11 $/year Around 50% lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year vs 109.5 $/year Around 50% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD Athlon X2 6400+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon X2 6400+

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 3.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz Around 35% higher clock speed
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.42 GHz vs 2.4 GHz Around 45% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better PassMark (Single core) score 968 vs 750 Around 30% better PassMark (Single core) score
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.53 GHz vs 2.4 GHz More than 45% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Opteron 1216 HE vs Athlon X2 6400+

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Opteron 1216 HE  vs
Athlon X2 6400+ 
Clock speed 2.4 GHz 3.2 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
AM2
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 65W 125W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year 30.11 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year 109.5 $/year
Performance per watt 1.07 pt/W 0.56 pt/W
Typical power consumption 52.81W 101.56W

details

Opteron 1216 HE  vs
Athlon X2 6400+ 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 1 MB 0 MB
L3 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 90 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Voltage range 1 - UnknownV 1.35 - 1.4V
Operating temperature 0 - 55°C Unknown - 55°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.4 GHz 3.42 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.4 GHz 3.53 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.4 GHz 3.42 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
AMD Opteron 1216 HE
Report a correction
AMD Athlon X2 6400+
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus