Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD K8 Athlon XP-M 3000+

Reasons to consider the
AMD K8 Athlon XP-M 3000+

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the K8 Athlon XP-M 3000+ vs the E1 2100.

Front view of AMD E1 2100

Reasons to consider the
AMD E1 2100

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the E1 2100 vs the K8 Athlon XP-M 3000+.

Benchmarks Real world tests of K8 Athlon XP-M 3000+ vs E1 2100

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

K8 Athlon XP-M 3000+  vs
E1 2100 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
F16C
MMX
AVX
SSE3
SSE
BMI1
AMD64
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AMD-V
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

K8 Athlon XP-M 3000+  vs
E1 2100 
Threads 1 2
L2 cache 0.25 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 130 nm 28 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 95°C Unknown - 90°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.97 GHz 1 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz 1 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.97 GHz 1 GHz

power consumption

TDP 62W 9W
Annual home energy cost 14.94 $/year 2.17 $/year
Performance per watt 0.63 pt/W 16.08 pt/W
Typical power consumption 50.38W 7.31W
AMD K8 Athlon XP-M 3000+
Report a correction
AMD E1 2100
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus