Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD K8 Athlon XP-M 3000+

Reasons to consider the
AMD K8 Athlon XP-M 3000+

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the K8 Athlon XP-M 3000+ vs the E1 1200.

Front view of AMD E1 1200

Reasons to consider the
AMD E1 1200

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the E1 1200 vs the K8 Athlon XP-M 3000+.

Benchmarks Real world tests of K8 Athlon XP-M 3000+ vs E1 1200

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

K8 Athlon XP-M 3000+  vs
E1 1200 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.4 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

K8 Athlon XP-M 3000+  vs
E1 1200 
Threads 1 2
L2 cache 0.25 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 130 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 95°C Unknown - 100°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.97 GHz 1.41 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz 1.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.97 GHz 1.41 GHz

power consumption

TDP 62W 18W
Annual home energy cost 14.94 $/year 4.34 $/year
Performance per watt 0.63 pt/W 2.33 pt/W
Typical power consumption 50.38W 14.63W
AMD K8 Athlon XP-M 3000+
Report a correction
AMD E1 1200
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus