Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD K8 Athlon XP-M 3000+

Reasons to consider the
AMD K8 Athlon XP-M 3000+

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the K8 Athlon XP-M 3000+ vs the Athlon Neo X2 L325.

Front view of AMD Athlon Neo X2 L325

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon Neo X2 L325

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Athlon Neo X2 L325 vs the K8 Athlon XP-M 3000+.

Benchmarks Real world tests of K8 Athlon XP-M 3000+ vs Athlon Neo X2 L325

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

K8 Athlon XP-M 3000+  vs
Athlon Neo X2 L325 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.5 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!

bus

Clock speed 266 MHz 333 MHz

details

K8 Athlon XP-M 3000+  vs
Athlon Neo X2 L325 
Threads 1 2
L2 cache 0.25 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 130 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 95°C Unknown - 95°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.97 GHz 1.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz 1.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.97 GHz 1.5 GHz

power consumption

TDP 62W 18W
Annual home energy cost 14.94 $/year 4.34 $/year
Performance per watt 0.63 pt/W 2.29 pt/W
Typical power consumption 50.38W 14.63W
AMD K8 Athlon XP-M 3000+
Report a correction
AMD Athlon Neo X2 L325
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus