Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD K8 Athlon XP-M 3000+

Reasons to consider the
AMD K8 Athlon XP-M 3000+

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 130 nm vs 180 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Front view of AMD Athlon MP 2100+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon MP 2100+

Report a correction
Slightly lower typical power consumption 45.83W vs 50.38W Around 10% lower typical power consumption
Slightly lower annual home energy cost 13.59 $/year vs 14.94 $/year Around 10% lower annual home energy cost
Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost 49.41 $/year vs 54.31 $/year Around 10% lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of K8 Athlon XP-M 3000+ vs Athlon MP 2100+

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

K8 Athlon XP-M 3000+  vs
Athlon MP 2100+ 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.73 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
462
754
563

features

Has a NX bit Yes No
Instruction set extensions
MMX
3DNow!
SSE
SSE2
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

bus

Clock speed 266 MHz 266 MHz

details

K8 Athlon XP-M 3000+  vs
Athlon MP 2100+ 
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 0.25 MB 0.25 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 130 nm 180 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.97 GHz 2.13 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz 1.73 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.97 GHz 2.13 GHz

power consumption

TDP 62W 56.4W
Annual home energy cost 14.94 $/year 13.59 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 54.31 $/year 49.41 $/year
Performance per watt 0.63 pt/W 0.62 pt/W
Typical power consumption 50.38W 45.83W
AMD K8 Athlon XP-M 3000+
Report a correction
AMD Athlon MP 2100+
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus