Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD K6-IIIE+ 400

Reasons to consider the
AMD K6-IIIE+ 400

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the K6-IIIE+ 400 vs the FX 6100.

Front view of AMD FX 6100

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 6100

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 180 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much more l2 cache 6 MB vs 0.25 MB 24x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much higher clock speed 3.3 GHz vs 0.4 GHz Around 8.2x higher clock speed
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Newer Oct, 2011 vs Sep, 2000 Release date over 11 years later

Features Key features of the K6-IIIE+ 400  vs FX 6100 

clock speed

K6-IIIE+ 400
0.4 GHz
FX 6100
3.3 GHz

L2 cache

K6-IIIE+ 400
0.25 MB
FX 6100
6 MB

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

K6-IIIE+ 400  vs
FX 6100 
Clock speed 0.4 GHz 3.3 GHz
Socket type
Super 7
AM3+

features

Has a NX bit No Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

bus

Clock speed 100 MHz 2,600 MHz

details

K6-IIIE+ 400  vs
FX 6100 
L2 cache 0.25 MB 6 MB
Manufacture process 180 nm 32 nm

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A N/A
AMD K6-IIIE+ 400
Report a correction
AMD FX 6100
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus