Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD K6-IIIE+ 400

Reasons to consider the
AMD K6-IIIE+ 400

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the K6-IIIE+ 400 vs the A10 5800K.

Front view of AMD A10 5800K

Reasons to consider the
AMD A10 5800K

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 180 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much higher clock speed 3.8 GHz vs 0.4 GHz 9.5x higher clock speed
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 0.25 MB 16x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Newer Oct, 2012 vs Sep, 2000 Release date over 12 years later

Features Key features of the K6-IIIE+ 400  vs A10 5800K 

clock speed

K6-IIIE+ 400
0.4 GHz
A10 5800K
3.8 GHz

L2 cache

K6-IIIE+ 400
0.25 MB
A10 5800K
4 MB

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

K6-IIIE+ 400  vs
A10 5800K 
Clock speed 0.4 GHz 3.8 GHz

features

Has a NX bit No Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

K6-IIIE+ 400  vs
A10 5800K 
L2 cache 0.25 MB 4 MB
Manufacture process 180 nm 32 nm

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 81.25W
AMD K6-IIIE+ 400
Report a correction
AMD A10 5800K
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus