Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD K5 100

Reasons to consider the
AMD K5 100

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the K5 100 vs the FX 6300.

Front view of AMD FX 6300

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 6300

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 350 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much higher clock speed 3.5 GHz vs 0.1 GHz 35x higher clock speed
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Newer Oct, 2012 vs Jun, 1996 Release date over 16 years later

Features Key features of the K5 100  vs FX 6300 

clock speed

K5 100
0.1 GHz
FX 6300
3.5 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

K5 100  vs
FX 6300 
Clock speed 0.1 GHz 3.5 GHz

features

Has a NX bit No Yes

bus

Clock speed 66 MHz 2,600 MHz

details

K5 100  vs
FX 6300 
Manufacture process 350 nm 32 nm

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 77.19W
AMD K5 100
Report a correction
AMD FX 6300
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus