Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Geode NX 2001

Reasons to consider the
AMD Geode NX 2001

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 1.8 GHz vs 1 GHz 80% higher clock speed
Higher Maximum operating temperature 95 °C vs 90 °C More than 5% higher Maximum operating temperature
Front view of AMD C 70

Reasons to consider the
AMD C 70

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 40 nm vs 130 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly more l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.25 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once

Features Key features of the Geode NX 2001  vs C 70 

clock speed

Geode NX 2001
1.8 GHz
AMD C 70
1 GHz

L2 cache

Geode NX 2001
0.25 MB
AMD C 70
1 MB

Specifications Full list of technical specs


Geode NX 2001  vs
C 70 
Clock speed 1.8 GHz 1 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core


Has a NX bit No Yes
Instruction set extensions
Supplemental SSE3


Geode NX 2001  vs
C 70 
Threads 1 2
L2 cache 0.25 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 130 nm 40 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 95°C Unknown - 90°C

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 7.31W
AMD Geode NX 2001
Report a correction
AMD C 70
Report a correction

Read more


comments powered by Disqus