Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Geode NX 2001

Reasons to consider the
AMD Geode NX 2001

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Geode NX 2001 vs the Athlon XP 3000+.

Front view of AMD Athlon XP 3000+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon XP 3000+

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 2.1 GHz vs 1.8 GHz More than 15% higher clock speed
More l2 cache 0.5 MB vs 0.25 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.47 GHz vs 2.25 GHz Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.74 GHz vs 1.8 GHz More than 50% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Features Key features of the Geode NX 2001  vs Athlon XP 3000+ 

clock speed

Geode NX 2001
1.8 GHz
Athlon XP 3000+
2.1 GHz

L2 cache

overclocked clock speed (air)

Geode NX 2001
2.25 GHz
Athlon XP 3000+
2.47 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Geode NX 2001
1.8 GHz
Athlon XP 3000+
2.74 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Geode NX 2001  vs
Athlon XP 3000+ 
Clock speed 1.8 GHz 2.1 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
462

features

Has a NX bit No No
Instruction set extensions
MMX
3DNow!
SSE

bus

Clock speed 266 MHz 400 MHz

details

Geode NX 2001  vs
Athlon XP 3000+ 
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 0.25 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 130 nm 130 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.25 GHz 2.47 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.8 GHz 2.74 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.25 GHz 2.47 GHz

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A N/A
AMD Geode NX 2001
Report a correction
AMD Athlon XP 3000+
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus