Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Geode NX 1750

Reasons to consider the
AMD Geode NX 1750

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Geode NX 1750 vs the E 300.

Front view of AMD E 300

Reasons to consider the
AMD E 300

Report a correction
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits

Benchmarks Real world tests of Geode NX 1750 vs E 300

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Geode NX 1750  vs
E 300 
Clock speed 1.4 GHz 1.3 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
AMD-V
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Geode NX 1750  vs
E 300 
Threads 1 2
L2 cache 0.25 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 130 nm 40 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 95°C Unknown - 90°C

power consumption

TDP 25W 18W
Performance per watt 0.48 pt/W 2.34 pt/W
Typical power consumption 20.31W 14.63W
AMD Geode NX 1750
Report a correction
AMD E 300
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus