Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Geode NX 1750

Reasons to consider the
AMD Geode NX 1750

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Geode NX 1750 vs the Athlon XP 3000+.

Front view of AMD Athlon XP 3000+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon XP 3000+

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 2.1 GHz vs 1.4 GHz More than 50% higher clock speed
More l2 cache 0.5 MB vs 0.25 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.47 GHz vs 1.92 GHz Around 30% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.74 GHz vs 1.4 GHz More than 95% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Geode NX 1750 vs Athlon XP 3000+

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Geode NX 1750  vs
Athlon XP 3000+ 
Clock speed 1.4 GHz 2.1 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
462

features

Has a NX bit No No
Instruction set extensions
MMX
3DNow!
SSE

bus

Clock speed 266 MHz 400 MHz

details

Geode NX 1750  vs
Athlon XP 3000+ 
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 0.25 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 130 nm 130 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.92 GHz 2.47 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.4 GHz 2.74 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.92 GHz 2.47 GHz

power consumption

Typical power consumption 20.31W N/A
AMD Geode NX 1750
Report a correction
AMD Athlon XP 3000+
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus