Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Geode NX 1750

Reasons to consider the
AMD Geode NX 1750

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Geode NX 1750 vs the Athlon MP 2200+.

Front view of AMD Athlon MP 2200+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon MP 2200+

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 1.8 GHz vs 1.4 GHz Around 30% higher clock speed
Slightly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.1 GHz vs 1.92 GHz Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.8 GHz vs 1.4 GHz Around 30% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Newer Jul, 2004 vs May, 2004 Release date 2 months later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Geode NX 1750 vs Athlon MP 2200+

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Geode NX 1750  vs
Athlon MP 2200+ 
Clock speed 1.4 GHz 1.8 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
462
563

features

Has a NX bit No No
Instruction set extensions
MMX
3DNow!
SSE
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

bus

Clock speed 266 MHz 266 MHz

details

Geode NX 1750  vs
Athlon MP 2200+ 
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 0.25 MB 0.25 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 130 nm 130 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.92 GHz 2.1 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.4 GHz 1.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.92 GHz 2.1 GHz

power consumption

Typical power consumption 20.31W N/A
AMD Geode NX 1750
Report a correction
AMD Athlon MP 2200+
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus