Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD G G-T16R

Reasons to consider the
AMD G G-T16R

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 3.66W vs 77.19W 21.1x lower typical power consumption
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 90 °C vs 70.5 °C Around 30% higher Maximum operating temperature
Much lower annual home energy cost 1.08 $/year vs 22.89 $/year 21.1x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 3.94 $/year vs 83.22 $/year 21.1x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD FX 4300

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 4300

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3.8 GHz vs 0.62 GHz Around 6.2x higher clock speed
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 0.5 MB 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.48 GHz vs 0.61 GHz More than 7.2x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Significantly newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 40 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
More cores 4 vs 1 3 more cores; run more applications at once
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.98 GHz vs 0.61 GHz More than 8x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
More threads 4 vs 1 3 more threads
Newer Oct, 2012 vs Jun, 2012 Release date 4 months later

Features Key features of the G G-T16R  vs FX 4300 

clock speed

G G-T16R
0.62 GHz
FX 4300
3.8 GHz

L2 cache

G G-T16R
0.5 MB
FX 4300
4 MB

overclocked clock speed (air)

G G-T16R
0.61 GHz
FX 4300
4.48 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

G G-T16R
0.61 GHz
FX 4300
4.98 GHz

TDP

G G-T16R
4.5W
FX 4300
95W

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

G G-T16R  vs
FX 4300 
Clock speed 0.62 GHz 3.8 GHz
Cores Single core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
AVX 1.1
SSE2
F16C
MMX
XOP
AVX
SSE3
SSE
ABM
BMI1
CLMUL
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
FMA3
SSE4.2
CVT16
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
TBM
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 4.5W 95W
Annual home energy cost 1.08 $/year 22.89 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 3.94 $/year 83.22 $/year
Typical power consumption 3.66W 77.19W

details

G G-T16R  vs
FX 4300 
Threads 1 4
L2 cache 0.5 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 40 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 90°C Unknown - 70.5°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 0.61 GHz 4.48 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 0.61 GHz 4.98 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 0.61 GHz 4.48 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label AMD Radeon HD 6250 N/A
GPU clock speed 276 MHz N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1866
DDR3L-1066
Channels Single Channel Dual Channel
Maximum bandwidth 6,400 MB/s 29,866.66 MB/s
AMD G G-T16R
Report a correction
AMD FX 4300
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus