CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 9590 vs 9370

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

FX 9590
7.6
FX 9370
7.4
Passmark, GeekBench (32-bit) and GeekBench (64-bit)

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

FX 9590
8.4
FX 9370
8.2
Passmark (Single Core)

Overclocking

How much speed can you get out of the processor?

FX 9590
9.9
FX 9370
9.8
Unlocked, Maximum Overclocked Clock Speed (Air) and 1 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

FX 9590
7.1
FX 9370
7.3
Performance Per Dollar

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Overclocking and Value

FX 9590
8.0
FX 9370
7.8

Winner
AMD FX 9590 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD FX 9590  based on its overclocking.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

AMD FX 9590

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of AMD FX 9590

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD FX 9590

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 9590

Report a correction
Higher turbo clock speed 5 GHz vs 4.7 GHz More than 5% higher turbo clock speed
Higher clock speed 4.7 GHz vs 4.4 GHz More than 5% higher clock speed
Better geekbench (64-bit) score 13,736 vs 11,555 Around 20% better geekbench (64-bit) score
Better 3DMark11 physics score 8,529 vs 7,420 Around 15% better 3DMark11 physics score
Better PassMark score 10,589 vs 9,572 More than 10% better PassMark score
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 5.13 GHz vs 4.5 GHz Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of AMD FX 9370

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 9370

Report a correction
Slightly better performance per dollar 6.91 pt/$ vs 6.2 pt/$ More than 10% better performance per dollar

Benchmarks Real world tests of FX 9590 vs 9370

GeekBench (32-bit)

FX 9590
12,728
FX 9370
11,806

GeekBench (64-bit)

FX 9590
13,736
FX 9370
11,555

GeekBench

FX 9590
13,736
FX 9370
11,806

Passmark

FX 9590
10,589
FX 9370
9,572
FX 9590 FX 9370 @ cpubenchmark.net

Passmark (Single Core)

FX 9590
1,719
FX 9370
1,610

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

FX 9590  vs
9370 
Clock speed 4.7 GHz 4.4 GHz
Turbo clock speed 5 GHz 4.7 GHz
Cores Octa core Octa core
Socket type
AM3+
Is unlocked Yes Yes
Is hyperthreaded No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
MMX
AVX 1.1
SSE
SSE4.2
AMD64
AVX
XOP
SSE3
CLMUL
FMA3
SSE2
FMA4
F16C
Supplemental SSE3
SSE4.1
ABM
SSE4a
AES
TBM
CVT16
AMD-V
BMI1
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 220W 220W
Annual home energy cost 53 $/year 53 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 192.72 $/year 192.72 $/year
Performance per watt 4.89 pt/W 5.19 pt/W
Typical power consumption 178.75W 178.75W

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1866
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC Yes Yes
Maximum bandwidth 29,866.66 MB/s 29,866.66 MB/s

details

FX 9590  vs
9370 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 8 8
L2 cache 8 MB 8 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 8 MB 8 MB
L3 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 32 nm
Transistor count 1,200,000,000 1,200,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Die size 319 mm² 319 mm²
Clock multiplier 25 23
Voltage range 1.91 - 2V 1.91 - 2V

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 5.14 GHz 5.29 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 5.13 GHz 4.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 5.14 GHz 5.29 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
AMD FX 9590
Report a correction
AMD FX 9370
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

Showing 1 comment.
How do they consume the same amount of power?
comments powered by Disqus