CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 9590 vs 8370 among desktop CPUs (over 75W)

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

FX 9590
8.1
FX 8370
6.9
FX 8350
7.3
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

FX 9590
6.6
FX 8370
6.0
FX 8350
5.9
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

FX 9590
0.0
FX 8370
0.0
FX 8350
0.0
Fire Strike

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

FX 9590
0.0
FX 8370
0.0
FX 8350
0.0
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

FX 9590
5.1
FX 8370
5.6
FX 8350
5.6
Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

FX 9590
6.0
FX 8370
6.0
FX 8350
6.3
Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD FX 9590

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 9590

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 9590 vs the 8370.

Front view of AMD FX 8370

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 8370

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 8370 vs the 9590.

Benchmarks Real world tests of FX 9590 vs 8370

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

FX 9590
13,818
FX 8370
11,583

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

FX 9590
2,549
FX 8370
2,186

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

FX 9590
2,790,000 MB/s
FX 8370
2,450,000 MB/s

Cinebench R10 32-Bit

FX 9590
26,635
FX 8370
23,394

Cinebench R10 32-Bit (Single Core)

FX 9590
4,905
FX 8370
4,436

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

FX 9590  vs
8370 
Clock speed 4.7 GHz 4 GHz
Turbo clock speed 5 GHz 4.3 GHz
Cores Octa core Octa core
Is unlocked Yes Yes

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
AVX 1.1
SSE2
F16C
MMX
XOP
AVX
SSE3
SSE
ABM
BMI1
CLMUL
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
FMA3
SSE4.2
CVT16
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
TBM
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 220W 125W
Annual home energy cost 53 $/year 30.11 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 192.72 $/year 109.5 $/year
Performance per watt 5.39 pt/W 12.35 pt/W
Typical power consumption 178.75W 101.56W

details

FX 9590  vs
8370 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 8 8
L2 cache 8 MB 8 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 8 MB 0 MB
L3 cache per core 1 MB/core 0 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 32 nm
Transistor count 1,200,000,000 1,200,000,000
Die size 319 mm² 319 mm²
Clock multiplier 25 21
Operating temperature Unknown - 57°C Unknown - 61°C

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1866
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC Yes Yes
Maximum bandwidth 29,866.66 MB/s 29,866.66 MB/s
AMD FX 9590
Report a correction
AMD FX 8370
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus