CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 9370 vs 8350

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

FX 9370
8.1
FX 8350
7.9
Passmark and GeekBench (32-bit)

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

FX 9370
8.5
FX 8350
8.3
Passmark (Single Core)

Overclocking

How much speed can you get out of the processor?

FX 9370
10.0
FX 8350
9.8
Unlocked, Maximum Overclocked Clock Speed (Air) and 1 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

FX 9370
7.4
FX 8350
7.5
Performance Per Dollar

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Overclocking and Value

FX 9370
8.3
FX 8350
8.1

Winner
AMD FX 9370 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD FX 9370  based on its overclocking.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

AMD FX 9370

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of AMD FX 9370

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD FX 9370

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 9370

Report a correction
Significantly higher turbo clock speed 4.7 GHz vs 4.2 GHz More than 10% higher turbo clock speed
Higher clock speed 4.4 GHz vs 4 GHz More than 10% higher clock speed
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 5.29 GHz vs 4.7 GHz More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Marginally newer Jun, 2013 vs Oct, 2012 Release date 7 months later
Lower annual home energy cost 53 $/year vs 56.1 $/year More than 5% lower annual home energy cost
Front view of AMD FX 8350

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 8350

Report a correction
Lower typical power consumption 159.66W vs 178.75W More than 10% lower typical power consumption
Lower annual commercial energy cost 159.62 $/year vs 192.72 $/year More than 15% lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of FX 9370 vs 8350

GeekBench (32-bit)

FX 9370
11,844
FX 8350
11,041

GeekBench

FX 9370
11,844
FX 8350
12,796

3D Mark 11 (Physics)

FX 9370
7,420
FX 8350
6,880
FX 9370 FX 8350 @ community.futuremark.com
The FX-8350 also gave us some significant gains in 3DMark 11.
FX 8350 | by Legit Reviews (Oct, 2012)

Passmark

FX 9370
9,604
FX 8350
9,134
FX 9370 FX 8350 @ cpubenchmark.net
Looking at the physics score we can see a difference of just under 900 points with the AMD FX-8350 taking the lead with 7325 3DMarks.
FX 8350 | by Legit Reviews (Oct, 2012)

Passmark (Single Core)

FX 9370
1,611
FX 8350
1,525
In Cinebench the AMD chip is only a little over 5 per cent slower, and in X264 there's less than a single per cent difference between them.
FX 8350 | by Tech Radar (Nov, 2012)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

FX 9370  vs
8350 
Clock speed 4.4 GHz 4 GHz
Turbo clock speed 4.7 GHz 4.2 GHz
Cores Octa core Octa core
Socket type
AM3+
Is unlocked Yes Yes
Is hyperthreaded No No

features

Has vitualization support Yes Yes
Instruction-set-extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE4.2
AVX
XOP
SSE3
SSE2
FMA4
F16C
Supplemental SSE3
SSE4.1
SSE4
SSE4a
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

gpu

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1866

details

FX 9370  vs
8350 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 8 8
L2 cache 8 MB 8 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 8 MB 8 MB
L3 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nms 32 nms
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 5.29 GHz 4.7 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 5.22 GHz 4.99 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 5.29 GHz 4.7 GHz

power consumption

TDP 220W 125W
Annual home energy cost 53 $/year 56.1 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 192.72 $/year 159.62 $/year
Performance per watt 5.42 pt/W 5.15 pt/W
Typical power consumption 178.75W 159.66W
AMD FX 9370
Report a correction
AMD FX 8350
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus