Winner
AMD FX 8350
CPUBoss recommends the AMD FX 8350 based on its .
See full details AMD FX 8350 vs 8320E |
VS
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 8350 vs 8320E among desktop CPUs (over 75W)
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Fire Strike | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 5.6 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 8350 Black Edition vs the 8320E. | |||||||
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 8320E vs the 8350 Black Edition. | |||||||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of FX 8350 vs 8320E
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
Cinebench R10 32-Bit
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | FX 8350 | vs | 8320E |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 4 GHz | 3.2 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 4.2 GHz | 4 GHz | |
| Cores | Octa core | Octa core | |
| Socket type | |||
| AM3+ | |||
| Is unlocked | Yes | Yes | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| AVX 1.1 | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| F16C | |||
| MMX | |||
| XOP | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| ABM | |||
| BMI1 | |||
| CLMUL | |||
| AMD64 | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| FMA4 | |||
| FMA3 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| CVT16 | |||
| AMD-V | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| TBM | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 125W | 95W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 56.1 $/year | 22.89 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 159.62 $/year | 83.22 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 5.72 pt/W | 11.12 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 159.66W | 77.19W | |
details | FX 8350 | vs | 8320E |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| L2 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 32 nm | 32 nm | |
| Transistor count | 1,200,000,000 | 1,200,000,000 | |
| Die size | 319 mm² | 319 mm² | |
| Clock multiplier | 21 | 20 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 61°C | Unknown - 70.5°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 4.69 GHz | 4.55 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 8.79 GHz | 4.5 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.69 GHz | 4.55 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1866 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 29,866.66 MB/s | 29,866.66 MB/s | |
 AMD FX 8350  Report a correction |  AMD FX 8320E Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $128 | $100 | |
| 8350 vs 6300 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $128 | $264 | |
| 8350 vs 3770K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $128 | $350 | |
| 8350 vs 6700K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $128 | $180 | |
| 8350 vs 8370 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $128 | $250 | |
| 8350 vs 6600K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $128 | $230 | |
| 8350 vs 9590 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $128 | $170 | |
| 8350 vs 8300 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS | |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | ||
| 6700K vs 7th Gen A12-9700P | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 5 comments.
