Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD FX 8350

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 8350

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 8 MB vs 0.25 MB 32x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 130 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much higher clock speed 4 GHz vs 0.95 GHz Around 4.2x higher clock speed
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
More cores 8 vs 1 7 more cores; run more applications at once
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
More threads 8 vs 1 7 more threads
Front view of AMD Athlon XP-M 1100+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon XP-M 1100+

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Athlon XP-M 1100+ vs the FX 8350.

Features Key features of the FX 8350  vs Athlon XP-M 1100+ 

clock speed

FX 8350
4 GHz

L2 cache

FX 8350
8 MB

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

FX 8350  vs
Athlon XP-M 1100+ 
Clock speed 4 GHz 0.95 GHz
Cores Octa core Single core
Socket type
AM3+
563

features

Has a NX bit Yes No
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

bus

Clock speed 2,600 MHz 200 MHz

details

FX 8350  vs
Athlon XP-M 1100+ 
Threads 8 1
L2 cache 8 MB 0.25 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 130 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

power consumption

Typical power consumption 159.66W N/A
AMD FX 8350
Report a correction
AMD Athlon XP-M 1100+
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus