CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 8350 vs 7800 among desktop CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

FX 8350
7.8
A10 7800
7.6
FX 6300
6.9
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

FX 8350
7.4
A10 7800
6.5
FX 6300
7.2
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

FX 8350
0.0
A10 7800
8.6
FX 6300
0.0
Fire Strike

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

FX 8350
0.0
A10 7800
9.3
FX 6300
0.0
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

FX 8350
5.0
A10 7800
7.3
FX 6300
5.2
Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

FX 8350
5.8
A10 7800
n.d.
FX 6300
6.0
Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

9.3

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

FX 8350
5.2
A10 7800
9.3
FX 6300
5.1

Winner
AMD FX 8350 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD FX 8350  based on its overclocking.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD FX 8350

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 8350

Report a correction
Is unlocked Yes vs No Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
Front view of AMD A10 7800

Reasons to consider the
AMD A10 7800

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 71.3 °C vs 61 °C More than 15% higher Maximum operating temperature

Benchmarks Real world tests of FX 8350 vs A10 7800

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

FX 8350
11,483
A10 7800
6,163

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

FX 8350
2,193
A10 7800
2,099

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

FX 8350
2,470,000 MB/s
A10 7800
2,090 MB/s

Cinebench R10 32-Bit

FX 8350
22,674
A10 7800
13,611

Cinebench R10 32-Bit (Single Core)

FX 8350
4,338
A10 7800
3,946

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

FX 8350
9,134
A10 7800
5,051

PassMark (Single Core)

FX 8350
1,525
A10 7800
1,537

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

FX 8350  vs
A10 7800 
Clock speed 4 GHz 3.5 GHz
Turbo clock speed 4.2 GHz 3.9 GHz
Cores Octa core Quad core
Is unlocked Yes No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
AVX 1.1
SSE2
F16C
MMX
XOP
AVX
SSE3
SSE
ABM
BMI1
CLMUL
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
FMA3
SSE4.2
CVT16
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
TBM

power consumption

TDP 125W 65W
Annual home energy cost 56.1 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 159.62 $/year 56.94 $/year
Performance per watt 5.72 pt/W 4.32 pt/W
Typical power consumption 159.66W 52.81W

details

FX 8350  vs
A10 7800 
L2 cache 8 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 28 nm
Operating temperature Unknown - 61°C Unknown - 71.3°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 4.69 GHz 4.19 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 8.79 GHz 3.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.69 GHz 4.19 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Radeon™ R7
Latest DirectX N/A 11.0
GPU clock speed N/A 720 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-2133
DDR3-1866
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Maximum bandwidth 29,866.66 MB/s 34,133.32 MB/s
AMD FX 8350
Report a correction
AMD A10 7800
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus