AMD FX 8350 vs A10 7700K

older Released October, 2012

AMD FX 8350

4 GHz
Octa core
Unlocked

Front view of AMD FX 8350

5.8 Out of 10

Maybe not the top-end eight-core FX-8150, but the great value and overclocking capabilities of the six-core FX-6200 made it a tantalising prospect for anyone on a budget looking to put together a gaming rig.

by Tech Radar (Nov, 2012)

VS

older Released January, 2014

AMD A10 7700K

3.4 GHz
Quad core
Unlocked

Front view of AMD A10 7700K

10 Out of 10

Reasons to buy the A10 7700K

Has a built-in GPU

Yes

Much higher Maximum operating temperature

72.4 °C

AMD will bundle both APUs (A10-7850K and A10-7700K) with Battlefield 4 which adds $59.99 US worth of value to these products.

by hassan-mujtaba (Jan, 2014)

	Performance
	Benchmark performance using all cores
FX 8350 7.9 A10 7700K 7.6 Core i7 3770K 8.6
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

	Single-core Performance
	Individual core benchmark performance
FX 8350 7.4 A10 7700K 7.2 Core i7 3770K 8.5
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

	Integrated Graphics
	Integrated GPU performance for graphics
FX 8350 0.0 A10 7700K 8.3 Core i7 3770K 6.2
Fire Strike

	Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)
	Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing
FX 8350 0.0 A10 7700K 8.7 Core i7 3770K 7.1
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

	Performance per Watt
	How efficiently does the processor use electricity?
FX 8350 5.1 A10 7700K n.d. Core i7 3770K 5.8
Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

	Value
	Are you paying a premium for performance?
FX 8350 6.2 A10 7700K 7.3 Core i7 3770K 5.7
Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

10	CPUBoss Score
	Combination of all six facets
FX 8350 5.8 A10 7700K 10.0 Core i7 3770K 8.2

Winner
AMD FX 8350

CPUBoss recommends the AMD FX 8350 based on its .

See full details

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

VS

AMD FX 8350

Front view of AMD FX 8350

Front view of AMD A10 7700K

AMD A10 7700K

Join the discussion

Front view of AMD FX 8350

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 8350

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the FX 8350 vs the A10 7700K.

Front view of AMD A10 7700K

Reasons to consider the
AMD A10 7700K

Report a correction

Has a built-in GPU

Yes

vs

No

Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required

Much higher Maximum operating temperature

72.4 °C

vs

61 °C

Around 20% higher Maximum operating temperature

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

11,483

6,252

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

2,193

2,109

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

2,470,000 MB/s

2,070,000 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

10,956

6,152

GeekBench

12,796

6,152

Cinebench R10 32-Bit

22,674

13,543

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

9,134

5,159

PassMark (Single Core)

1,525

1,494

summary	FX 8350	vs	A10 7700K
Clock speed	4 GHz		3.4 GHz
Turbo clock speed	4.2 GHz		3.8 GHz
Cores	Octa core		Quad core
Socket type
AM3+
FM2+
Is unlocked	Yes		Yes
features
Has a NX bit	Yes		Yes
Has virtualization support	Yes		Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
AVX 1.1
SSE2
F16C
MMX
XOP
AVX
SSE3
SSE
ABM
BMI1
CLMUL
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
FMA3
SSE4.2
CVT16
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
TBM
memory controller
Memory controller	Built-in		Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-2133
DDR3-1866
Channels	Dual Channel		Dual Channel
Maximum bandwidth	29,866.66 MB/s		34,133.32 MB/s

details	FX 8350	vs	A10 7700K
Threads	8		4
L2 cache	8 MB		4 MB
L2 cache per core	1 MB/core		1 MB/core
Manufacture process	32 nm		28 nm
Operating temperature	Unknown - 61°C		Unknown - 72.4°C
integrated graphics
GPU	None		GPU
Label	N/A		Radeon R7 series
Latest DirectX	N/A		11.0
GPU clock speed	N/A		720 MHz
power consumption
Typical power consumption	159.66W		N/A

AMD FX 8350

Report a correction

AMD A10 7700K

Report a correction

VS

Intel Core i7 6700K vs AMD FX 8350

VS

Intel Core i7 6700K vs AMD A10 7700K

Comments

comments powered by Disqus