AMD FX 8320E vs 8320

	Performance
	Benchmark performance using all cores
FX 8320E 8.8 FX 8320 8.4 FX 6300 6.1
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

	Single-core Performance
	Individual core benchmark performance
FX 8320E 5.4 FX 8320 4.4 FX 6300 4.9
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

	Integrated Graphics
	Integrated GPU performance for graphics
FX 8320E 0.0 FX 8320 0.0 FX 6300 0.0
Fire Strike

	Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)
	Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing
FX 8320E 0.0 FX 8320 0.0 FX 6300 0.0
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

	Performance per Watt
	How efficiently does the processor use electricity?
FX 8320E 5.8 FX 8320 4.8 FX 6300 5.0
Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

	Value
	Are you paying a premium for performance?
FX 8320E 5.5 FX 8320 5.4 FX 6300 5.8
Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

5.3	CPUBoss Score
	Combination of all six facets
FX 8320E 5.3 FX 8320 4.8 FX 6300 4.8

Winner
AMD FX 8320E

CPUBoss recommends the AMD FX 8320E based on its .

See full details

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

VS

AMD FX 8320E

Front view of AMD FX 8320E

Front view of AMD FX 8320

AMD FX 8320

Join the discussion

Front view of AMD FX 8320E

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 8320E

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 8320E vs the 8320 Black Edition.

Front view of AMD FX 8320

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 8320

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 8320 Black Edition vs the 8320E.

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

11,929

10,352

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

2,244

2,066

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

2,550,000 MB/s

2,320,000 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

8,967

9,798

GeekBench

8,967

11,631

Cinebench R10 32-Bit

28,039

20,870

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

7,512

8,183

PassMark (Single Core)

1,361

1,402

summary	FX 8320E	vs	8320
Clock speed	3.2 GHz		3.5 GHz
Turbo clock speed	4 GHz		4 GHz
Cores	Octa core		Octa core
Socket type
AM3+
Is unlocked	Yes		Yes
features
Has a NX bit	Yes		Yes
Has virtualization support	Yes		Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
AVX 1.1
SSE2
F16C
MMX
XOP
AVX
SSE3
SSE
ABM
BMI1
CLMUL
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
FMA3
SSE4.2
CVT16
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
TBM
Supports dynamic frequency scaling	Yes		Yes
power consumption
TDP	95W		125W
Annual home energy cost	22.89 $/year		30.11 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost	83.22 $/year		109.5 $/year
Performance per watt	11.12 pt/W		7.79 pt/W
Typical power consumption	77.19W		101.56W

details	FX 8320E	vs	8320
Architecture	x86-64		x86-64
L2 cache	8 MB		8 MB
L2 cache per core	1 MB/core		1 MB/core
L3 cache	8 MB		8 MB
L3 cache per core	1 MB/core		1 MB/core
Manufacture process	32 nm		32 nm
Transistor count	1,200,000,000		1,200,000,000
Die size	319 mm²		319 mm²
Clock multiplier	20		20
Operating temperature	Unknown - 70.5°C		Unknown - 61.1°C
overclocking
Overclocked clock speed	4.55 GHz		4.56 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water)	4.5 GHz		4.75 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air)	4.55 GHz		4.56 GHz
integrated graphics
GPU	None		None
Label	N/A		N/A
Latest DirectX	N/A		N/A
Number of displays supported	N/A		N/A
GPU clock speed	N/A		N/A
Turbo clock speed	N/A		N/A
3DMark06	N/A		N/A
memory controller
Memory controller	Built-in		Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1866
Channels	Dual Channel		Dual Channel
Supports ECC	Yes		Yes
Maximum bandwidth	29,866.66 MB/s		29,866.66 MB/s

AMD FX 8320E

Report a correction

AMD FX 8320

Report a correction

Follow us

Compare

Popular Comparisons

VS

6300 vs 8320E

VS

6300 vs 8320

Comments

comments powered by Disqus