CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 8320 vs 6350 among desktop CPUs (over 75W)

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

FX 8320
7.0
FX 6350
6.6
FX 8350
7.4
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

FX 8320
6.7
FX 6350
6.9
FX 8350
6.9
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

FX 8320
0.0
FX 6350
0.0
FX 8350
0.0
Fire Strike

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

FX 8320
0.0
FX 6350
0.0
FX 8350
0.0
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

FX 8320
5.6
FX 6350
5.6
FX 8350
5.7
Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

FX 8320
6.3
FX 6350
6.3
FX 8350
6.5
Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of AMD FX 6350

AMD FX 6350

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD FX 8320

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 8320

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 9,798 vs 8,173 Around 20% better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score
Much more l3 cache 8 MB vs 0 MB Compared to all cpus, 8 MB l3 cache is just OK
More l2 cache 8 MB vs 6 MB Around 35% more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More cores 8 vs 6 2 more cores; run more applications at once
More threads 8 vs 6 2 more threads
Much more l3 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0 MB/core Compared to all cpus, 1 MB/core l3 cache per core is just OK
Better PassMark score 8,183 vs 7,379 More than 10% better PassMark score
Better cinebench r10 32Bit score 20,870 vs 17,802 More than 15% better cinebench r10 32Bit score
Front view of AMD FX 6350

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 6350

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 3.9 GHz vs 3.5 GHz More than 10% higher clock speed
Higher turbo clock speed 4.2 GHz vs 4 GHz More than 5% higher turbo clock speed
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,511 vs 1,402 Around 10% better PassMark (Single core) score
Significantly better cinebench r10 32Bit 1-core score 4,286 vs 3,987 More than 5% better cinebench r10 32Bit 1-core score
Better performance per dollar 9.82 pt/$ vs 7.34 pt/$ Around 35% better performance per dollar
Newer Apr, 2013 vs Oct, 2012 Release date 6 months later
Slightly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.88 GHz vs 4.76 GHz Around 5% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of FX 8320 vs 6350

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

FX 8320
10,352
FX 6350
8,598

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

FX 8320
2,066
FX 6350
2,174

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

FX 8320
2,320,000 MB/s
FX 6350
2,470,000 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

FX 8320
9,798
FX 6350
8,173

GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

FX 8320
10,594
FX 6350
9,528

GeekBench

FX 8320
11,631
FX 6350
9,528

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

FX 8320
8,183
FX 6350
7,379

PassMark (Single Core)

FX 8320
1,402
FX 6350
1,511

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

FX 8320  vs
6350 
Clock speed 3.5 GHz 3.9 GHz
Turbo clock speed 4 GHz 4.2 GHz
Cores Octa core Hexa core
Socket type
AM3+
Is unlocked Yes Yes

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
AVX 1.1
SSE2
F16C
MMX
XOP
AVX
SSE3
SSE
ABM
BMI1
CLMUL
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
FMA3
SSE4.2
CVT16
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
TBM
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1866
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC Yes Yes
Maximum bandwidth 29,866.66 MB/s 29,866.66 MB/s

details

FX 8320  vs
6350 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 8 6
L2 cache 8 MB 6 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 8 MB 0 MB
L3 cache per core 1 MB/core 0 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 32 nm
Transistor count 1,200,000,000 1,200,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Die size 319 mm² 319 mm²
Clock multiplier 20 21
Voltage range 0.8 - 1.43V 0.8 - 1.45V
Operating temperature Unknown - 61.1°C Unknown - 61°C

overclocking

Overclock popularity 63 3
Overclocked clock speed 4.64 GHz 4.66 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.76 GHz 4.88 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 9,317 3,626.2
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.64 GHz 4.66 GHz

power consumption

TDP 125W 125W
Annual home energy cost 30.11 $/year 30.11 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 109.5 $/year 109.5 $/year
Performance per watt 7.93 pt/W 8.19 pt/W
Typical power consumption 101.56W 101.56W
AMD FX 8320
Report a correction
AMD FX 6350
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

Showing 2 comments.
You can find on some international sites or brazil computer shops.Check if that sites are shipping to brazil
Where I find FX 6350 to buy? I'm from Brazil.
comments powered by Disqus