Winner
AMD FX 8320
CPUBoss recommends the AMD FX 8320 based on its .
See full details AMD FX 8320 vs 6350 |
Released October, 2012
AMD FX 8320
- 3.5 GHz
- Octa core
- Unlocked
7.7 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the AMD FX 8320
 | More l2 cache 8 MB | | Much better PassMark (Overclocked) score 9,317 |
| | More cores 8 | | More threads 8 |
VS
Released October, 2012
AMD FX 6350
- 3.9 GHz
- Hexa core
- Unlocked
7.6 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the 6350
| | Higher clock speed 3.9 GHz | | More l3 cache per core 1.33 MB/core |
| | Slightly better PassMark (Single core) score 1,511 | | Slightly better performance per dollar 6.15 pt/$ |
by Tech RadarAll GPUs being equal, the AMD chip is going to hold back your graphics card in comparison to the performance you could get in combination with an Intel CPU.
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 8320 vs 6350
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| Cinebench R10 32-bit, Passmark, GeekBench (32-bit) and GeekBench (64-bit) | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| Cinebench R10 32-bit (1-core) and Passmark (Single Core) | |
Overclocking | |
How much speed can you get out of the processor? | |
| Passmark (Overclocked), Unlocked, Maximum Overclocked Clock Speed (Air) and 2 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Performance Per Dollar | |
CPUBoss Score | |
Performance, Single-core Performance, Overclocking and Value | |
 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
AMD FX 8320CPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| More l2 cache | 8 MB | vs | 6 MB | Around 35% more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much better PassMark (Overclocked) score | 9,317 | vs | 3,626.2 | More than 2.5x better PassMark (Overclocked) score | |||
| More cores | 8 | vs | 6 | 2 more cores; run more applications at once | |||
| More threads | 8 | vs | 6 | 2 more threads | |||
| Slightly better PassMark score | 8,183 | vs | 7,379 | More than 10% better PassMark score | |||
| Better cinebench r10 32Bit score | 20,870 | vs | 18,021 | More than 15% better cinebench r10 32Bit score | |||
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 3.9 GHz | vs | 3.5 GHz | More than 10% higher clock speed | |||
| More l3 cache per core | 1.33 MB/core | vs | 1 MB/core | Around 35% more l3 cache per core | |||
| Slightly better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,511 | vs | 1,402 | Around 10% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Slightly better performance per dollar | 6.15 pt/$ | vs | 5.72 pt/$ | More than 5% better performance per dollar | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of FX 8320 vs 6350
GeekBench (32-bit)
Passmark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | FX 8320 | vs | 6350 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 3.9 GHz | |
| Cores | Octa core | Hexa core | |
| Socket type | |||
| AM3+ | |||
| Is unlocked | Yes | Yes | |
| Is hyperthreaded | No | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has vitualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction-set-extensions | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| AVX | |||
| XOP | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| FMA3 | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| FMA4 | |||
| F16C | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| AES | |||
| SSE Family | |||
| FMA | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 125W | 125W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 30.11 $/year | 30.11 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 109.5 $/year | 109.5 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 6.87 pt/W | 6.89 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 101.56W | 101.56W | |
details | FX 8320 | vs | 6350 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 8 | 6 | |
| L2 cache | 8 MB | 6 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1.33 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 32 nms | 32 nms | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclock popularity | 63 | 3 | |
| Overclocked clock speed | 4.64 GHz | 4.66 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.86 GHz | 4.83 GHz | |
| PassMark (Overclocked) | 9,317 | 3,626.2 | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.64 GHz | 4.66 GHz | |
 AMD FX 8320  Report a correction |  AMD FX 6350 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $180 | $150 | |
| 8350 vs 8320 | ||
 | VS | |
| $120 | $150 | |
| 6300 vs 8320 | ||
 | VS | |
| $230 | $150 | |
| 3570K vs 8320 | ||
 | VS | |
| $195 | $150 | |
| 4440 vs 8320 | ||
 | VS | |
| $235 | $150 | |
| 4670K vs 8320 | ||
 | VS | |
| $195 | $150 | |
| 4460 vs 8320 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $120 | $140 | |
| 6300 vs 6350 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $323 | $313 | |
| 9590 vs 4770K | ||
 | VS | |
| $340 | $313 | |
| 4790K vs 4770K | ||
 | VS | |
| $195 | $313 | |
| 4790 vs 4770K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $378 | ||
| 4700MQ vs 5750M | ||
| | VS | |
| $235 | $180 | |
| 4670K vs 8350 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $393 | $281 | |
| 4500U vs 4200U | ||
 | VS | |
| $225 | $281 | |
| 4200M vs 4200U | ||
