AMD FX 8320 vs 6350

Released October, 2012

AMD FX 8320

3.5 GHz
Octa core
Unlocked

Front view of AMD FX 8320

7.9 Out of 10

Reasons to buy the AMD FX 8320

	More l2 cache 8 MB		More cores 8
	More threads 8		Better geekbench (32-bit) score 9,980

whatever), good performance for your buck, fast delivery, cheaper to upgrade using AMD cpus (generally the same motherboard, memory, etc.), noticeably faster than quad core cpu for application running and very noticeable for multitasking applications, no need to overclock as it's plenty fast.

by PH--PH (Sep, 2013)

VS

Released October, 2012

AMD FX 6350

3.9 GHz
Hexa core
Unlocked

Front view of AMD FX 6350

7.8 Out of 10

Reasons to buy the 6350

	Higher clock speed 3.9 GHz		More l3 cache per core 1.33 MB/core
	Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,511		Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 5.14 GHz

It's a great cpu for overclocking as well.

by Alex-Mosier (Oct, 2013)

	Performance
	Benchmark performance using all cores
FX 8320 7.6 FX 6350 7.2
Passmark and GeekBench (32-bit)

	Single-core Performance
	Individual core benchmark performance
FX 8320 8.1 FX 6350 8.4
Passmark (Single Core)

	Overclocking
	How much speed can you get out of the processor?
FX 8320 9.3 FX 6350 9.3
Unlocked, Maximum Overclocked Clock Speed (Air) and 2 more

	Value
	Are you paying a premium for performance?
FX 8320 7.9 FX 6350 8.0
Performance Per Dollar

	CPUBoss Score
	Performance, Single-core Performance, Overclocking and Value
FX 8320 7.9 FX 6350 7.8

Winner
AMD FX 8320

CPUBoss recommends the AMD FX 8320 based on its .

See full details

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

VS

AMD FX 8320

CPUBoss Winner

Front view of AMD FX 8320

Front view of AMD FX 6350

AMD FX 6350

Join the discussion

Front view of AMD FX 8320

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 8320

Report a correction

More l2 cache

8 MB

vs

6 MB

Around 35% more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later

More cores

8

vs

6

2 more cores; run more applications at once

More threads

8

vs

6

2 more threads

Better geekbench (32-bit) score

9,980

vs

8,264

More than 20% better geekbench (32-bit) score

Slightly better PassMark score

8,183

vs

7,379

More than 10% better PassMark score

Front view of AMD FX 6350

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 6350

Report a correction

Higher clock speed

3.9 GHz

vs

3.5 GHz

More than 10% higher clock speed

More l3 cache per core

1.33 MB/core

vs

1 MB/core

Around 35% more l3 cache per core

Better PassMark (Single core) score

1,511

vs

1,402

Around 10% better PassMark (Single core) score

Better overclocked clock speed (Water)

5.14 GHz

vs

4.85 GHz

More than 5% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

GeekBench (32-bit)

9,980

8,264

browser.primatelabs.com

GeekBench

11,631

8,264

3D Mark 11 (Physics)

6,070

6,590

FX 8320 FX 6350 @ community.futuremark.com

Passmark

8,183

7,379

FX 8320 FX 6350 @ cpubenchmark.net

Regretfully, even though Cinebench gives good scores, this CPU is not faster than my Macbook Pro 2011 in Maya/Mental Ray.

FX 8320 | by M.-S.-Edwards--cristobal (Jul, 2013)

Passmark (Single Core)

1,402

1,511

cpubenchmark.net

Benches, all I managed to do atm is Cinebench.

FX 8320 | by NC (Nov, 2012)

FX 8320		vs	6350

	9.5 read review		9.7 read review	This 6-core processor was built for multitasking (and overclocking- mine's running overclocked at 4ghz- 29C idle with stock heatsink and fan- Pretty great if you ask me)! FX 6350

summary	FX 8320	vs	6350
Clock speed	3.5 GHz		3.9 GHz
Cores	Octa core		Hexa core
Socket type
AM3+
Is unlocked	Yes		Yes
Is hyperthreaded	No		No
features
Has a NX bit	Yes		Yes
Has vitualization support	Yes		Yes
Instruction-set-extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE4.2
AVX
XOP
SSE3
FMA3
SSE2
FMA4
F16C
Supplemental SSE3
SSE4.1
SSE4
SSE4a
AES
SSE Family
FMA
Supports dynamic frequency scaling	Yes		Yes
power consumption
TDP	125W		125W
Annual home energy cost	30.11 $/year		30.11 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost	109.5 $/year		109.5 $/year
Performance per watt	6.99 pt/W		7.36 pt/W
Typical power consumption	101.56W		101.56W

details	FX 8320	vs	6350
Threads	8		6
L2 cache	8 MB		6 MB
L2 cache per core	1 MB/core		1 MB/core
L3 cache	8 MB		8 MB
L3 cache per core	1 MB/core		1.33 MB/core
Manufacture process	32 nms		32 nms
Max CPUs	1		1
overclocking
Overclock popularity	63		3
Overclocked clock speed	4.68 GHz		4.65 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water)	4.85 GHz		5.14 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air)	4.68 GHz		4.65 GHz

AMD FX 8320

Report a correction

AMD FX 6350

Report a correction

Follow us

Compare

Popular Comparisons

VS

8350 vs 8320

VS

6300 vs 6350

Comments

comments powered by Disqus