0 Comments
| AMD FX 8320 vs Duron 1400 |
Released October, 2012
AMD FX 8320
- 3.5 GHz
- Octa core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the AMD FX 8320
![]() | Much more l2 cache 8 MB | ![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm |
![]() | Much higher clock speed 3.5 GHz | ![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.56 GHz |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 8 MB | vs | 0.06 MB | More than 133.2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 130 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much higher clock speed | 3.5 GHz | vs | 1.4 GHz | More than 2.5x higher clock speed | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.56 GHz | vs | 1.52 GHz | Around 3x better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
More cores | 8 | vs | 1 | 7 more cores; run more applications at once | |||
More threads | 8 | vs | 1 | 7 more threads | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.06 MB/core | Around 16.8x more l2 cache per core | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.75 GHz | vs | 1.4 GHz | Around 3.5x better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Duron 1400 vs the FX 8320. | |||||||
Features Key features of the FX 8320 vs Duron 1400
clock speed
FX 8320
3.5 GHz
Duron 1400
1.4 GHz
L2 cache
FX 8320
8 MB
Duron 1400
0.06 MB
overclocked clock speed (air)
FX 8320
4.56 GHz
Duron 1400
1.52 GHz
overclocked clock speed (water)
FX 8320
4.75 GHz
Duron 1400
1.4 GHz
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | FX 8320 | vs | Duron 1400 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 1.4 GHz | |
Cores | Octa core | Single core | |
Socket type | |||
AM3+ | |||
462 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
AVX 1.1 | |||
SSE2 | |||
F16C | |||
MMX | |||
XOP | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
ABM | |||
BMI1 | |||
CLMUL | |||
AMD64 | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
FMA4 | |||
FMA3 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
CVT16 | |||
AMD-V | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
TBM | |||
bus | |||
Clock speed | 2,600 MHz | 266 MHz |
details | FX 8320 | vs | Duron 1400 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 8 | 1 | |
L2 cache | 8 MB | 0.06 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.06 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 32 nm | 130 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 4.56 GHz | 1.52 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.75 GHz | 1.4 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.56 GHz | 1.52 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
Typical power consumption | 101.56W | N/A |
AMD FX 8320 ![]() | AMD Duron 1400 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$140 | $100 | |
8320 vs 6300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$140 | $128 | |
8320 vs 8350 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$140 | $146 | |
8320 vs 8320E | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$140 | $184 | |
8320 vs 3570K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$140 | $190 | |
8320 vs 4460 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$140 | $170 | |
8320 vs 8300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$140 | $130 | |
8320 vs 6350 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||