AMD FX 8320 vs Athlon 64 FX 72 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the FX 8320 vs the Athlon 64 FX 72. | |||||||
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Athlon 64 FX 72 vs the FX 8320. | |||||||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of FX 8320 vs Athlon 64 FX 72
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | FX 8320 | vs | Athlon 64 FX 72 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
| Cores | Octa core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| AM3+ | |||
| F | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| AVX 1.1 | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| F16C | |||
| MMX | |||
| XOP | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| ABM | |||
| BMI1 | |||
| CLMUL | |||
| AMD64 | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| FMA4 | |||
| FMA3 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| CVT16 | |||
| AMD-V | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| TBM | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
details | FX 8320 | vs | Athlon 64 FX 72 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 8 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 8 MB | 2 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 32 nm | 90 nm | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 61.1°C | Unknown - 63°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 4.56 GHz | 3.05 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.75 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.56 GHz | 3.05 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 125W | 125W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 30.11 $/year | 30.11 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 109.5 $/year | 109.5 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 7.79 pt/W | 0.59 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 101.56W | 101.56W | |
 AMD FX 8320  Report a correction |  AMD Athlon 64 FX 72 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $140 | $128 | |
| 8320 vs 8350 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $140 | $100 | |
| 8320 vs 6300 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $140 | $146 | |
| 8320 vs 8320E | ||
| | VS |  |
| $140 | $184 | |
| 8320 vs 3570K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $140 | $190 | |
| 8320 vs 4460 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $140 | $130 | |
| 8320 vs 6350 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $140 | $170 | |
| 8320 vs 8300 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| 847 vs 3217U | ||
 | VS | |
| $250 | $350 | |
| 6600K vs 6700K | ||
